ShareThis Page
Mankins resigns as Greensburg Salem boys basketball coach |

Mankins resigns as Greensburg Salem boys basketball coach

| Friday, June 15, 2018 8:57 p.m
Christian Tyler Randolph | Tribune-Review
Greensburg Salem Head Coach Craig Mankins during practice on Friday Nov. 24, 2017 at Greensburg Salem.

Needing to tend to some personal issues at home with his family, Craig Mankins resigned as boys basketball coach at Greensburg Salem.

Mankins coached the Golden Lions for six seasons and compiled a record of 48-87 with three WPIAL playoff appearances.

Greensburg Salem finished 12-11 last season and lost to Trinity in the first round of the Class 5A playoffs.

“I loved working with the team the last six years,” Mankins said. “It was so tough to tell them (the news he was resigning) … the look on some of their faces.

“I have to take care of my family right now. That’s the most important thing.”

Mankins, the director of golf at Hannastown Golf Club in Greensburg since 2009, will not get to officially coach his son, Jeffrey, who will be a junior guard on the team. His wife, Lisa, also is leaving the program after serving as an assistant coach.

Craig and Lisa also have two daughters coming up in the girls basketball program.

Craig Mankins coached the boys team at Penns Manor from 2002-06 and was an assistant with the Elderton girls and Indiana boys.

He replaced longtime Greensburg Salem coach Paul Sapotichne, who coached the Golden Lions for 29 years and won 399 games.

“I have worked with some amazing people,” Craig Mankins said. “I could not have asked for a better AD (athletic director) in Lynn Jobe.”

Change is in the air at Salem. Jobe announced her retirement after more than three decades in the district. She has been AD since 2010.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BillBeckner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.