ShareThis Page
Record-setting football coach Tom Nola considers return to sideline |

Record-setting football coach Tom Nola considers return to sideline

Ronald Vezzani Jr. | For the Daily News
Clairton coach Tom Nola watches over practice Monday, Aug. 12, 2013.

Retired football coach Tom Nola considered a comeback this winter while relaxing on the beaches of sunny Florida.

“I went to a few games last year and I missed it,” said Nola, 64, who won four state titles as Clairton’s coach, “but it is a year-round thing. You can’t just take time off to come down here to Florida.”

That’s likely a sticking point for potential schools, said Nola, who wants to return to the Sunshine State for three months each year when the weather turns cold. He talked with Charleroi about its job opening before the school hired Lance Getsy last month, but Nola also made it clear he wouldn’t travel north until spring.

“I was thinking about it,” Nola said, “but I’m down in Daytona. Teams think that they don’t have the commitment that they want. I probably won’t do it.”

In 12 seasons at Clairton, Nola’s teams went 141-22 from 2002-13 with six WPIAL titles and four consecutive PIAA titles. He also oversaw a 66-game winning streak that ranks as the longest in state history.

Nola coached two seasons at Gateway before resigning in 2015.

Even if a head coaching job isn’t in his future, he hasn’t ruled out a return to the sidelines.

“Maybe as an assistant,” he said. “Maybe someone would want me there after the winter.”

If not, he’s still OK.

“I can do without it,” he said. “I like my life now.”

Chris Harlan is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.