ShareThis Page
Quaker Valley’s Hubsch earns 7th place at PIAA swimming |

Quaker Valley’s Hubsch earns 7th place at PIAA swimming

Michael Love

Quaker Valley was well-represented in the championship and consolation finals at the PIAA Class AA swimming and diving championships Friday and Saturday at Bucknell.

The Quakers made it back to the evening sessions in five swim events. The top eight after the preliminary heats advanced to the championship final, while those in ninth through 16th moved to the consolation final.

Leading the way was junior Andres Hubsch, who took seventh in the 100-yard backstroke with a time of 53.55 seconds, down from 53.71 in the preliminaries.

He also finished 14th in the 100 butterfly (53.72).

Senior Kevin Bergdoll produced an 11th in the 100 breaststroke in 1:00.66, lower than his prelim time of 1:01.22.

The 200 medley relay of Bergdoll, Hubsch and seniors Ben Mastrorocco and Declan McGranahan finished 13th at 1:40.32, down from 1:41.64 in the prelims; while the 400 free relay of Bergdoll, Hubsch, senior Devon Jones and junior Kieran Ragowansi placed 14th with a 3:20.78, also lower than its prelim swim of 3:21.85.

In addition to the swimmers, freshman Simon Iwanonkiw made his PIAA debut in Friday’s boys diving competition. He advanced to the top-20 semifinals and placed 18th with 208.55 points.

The Quakers’ 35 points earned them 19th place in the final boys team standings.

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @Mlove_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.