ShareThis Page
Penn-Trafford’s Kalik claims 6th at PIAA diving meet |

Penn-Trafford’s Kalik claims 6th at PIAA diving meet

Michael Love

For the second year in a row, Penn-Trafford junior Paige Kalik is a PIAA diving medalist.

Kalik, this year’s WPIAL Class AAA champion, was one of nine divers in the field last week at Bucknell to break 400 points, and her total of 412.20 put her in sixth overall.

“I was a little nervous going through the dives, not knowing where I would end up,” said Kalik, who also took sixth at states last year.

“I got a medal, which is pretty nice. I’m pretty happy about that.”

Kalik also placed sixth at states last year.

She came to this year’s competition seeded 13th and moved up to fourth after the five-dive first round. She also was sixth entering the final round.

“The scoring is really different for each district, so I kind of ignored my seed and just went in and focused on each dive one at a time,” Kalik said. “I was pretty confident I would move up.”

North Penn teammates Meghan Wentzel and Paige Burrell finished tied for the championship, each scoring 465.50 points.

Penn-Trafford swimmers came close to earning second swims in the consolation finals which went to competitors who placed ninth through 16th in the preliminaries.

Hannah Muro challenged for a second swim in the girls 100-yard backstroke, and she placed 19th with a time of 58.41 seconds, just 20 one-hundredths of a second out of the top 16.

The boys 400 freestyle relay of junior Luke Babik and seniors John Sandala, Zach Snelling and Jacob Yant placed 17th with a time of 3:13.89, less than a second away from 16th.

The 200 free relay of Babik, Sandala, Yant and sophomore Nick Graziano placed 19th (1:28.24).

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @Mlove_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.