ShareThis Page
Franklin Regional’s Busche, Kohlman earn bronze medals at PIAA meet |

Franklin Regional’s Busche, Kohlman earn bronze medals at PIAA meet

| Friday, June 1, 2018 8:51 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Franklin Regional's Jacob Shedd competes in the Class AAA boys triple jump Friday, May 25, 2018, during the PIAA track and field state championships at Shippensburg University.

Franklin Regional seniors Matt Busche and Tyrese Kohlman earned bronze medals at the PIAA Class AAA track and field championships May 26 at Shippensburg.

Busche, the WPIAL 800-meter champion, placed third at the state meet, but his time didn’t match the 1-minute, 53.31-second effort he ran at Baldwin. His best time at Seth Grove Stadium was 1:54.66 in the finals.

“I’m pleased,” Busche said. “The competition was tough and the pace was fast.”

He finished behind Pottsville senior Collin Ebling (1:53.59) and Ephrata sophomore Tyler Shue (1:53.88).

Kohlman was sort of a surprise with his third-place finish (22.31), just ahead of Hempfield senior Eudel Moreta (22.37). He finished behind Harry S. Truman senior Sayyid Saunders (21.40) and Neshaminy junior Savion Hebron (22.01).

Franklin Regional senior Jacob Shedd competed in two events — the long jump and triple jump.

He jumped 13 spots to place seventh in the triple jump. He was in the first flight and jumped a personal best 45 feet, 9½ inches. His previous best was 44-6¾. In the finals he was hoping to reach more than 46 feet, but he fouled on all three of his jumps.

“I missed by a quarter inch on two of the jumps,” Shedd said. “I was happy that I placed.”

Franklin Regional’s Rachel Todero competed in the triple jump and jumped 35-5. Her previous best jump was 35-4.

The Panthers’ Tiffany Jolayemi competed in the discus and threw 113-6. She threw 114-6 at Baldwin.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.