Archive

ShareThis Page
Red-hot Cubs bolster rotation by trading for Hamels | TribLIVE.com
MLB

Red-hot Cubs bolster rotation by trading for Hamels

Three years ago Wednesday, Cole Hamels threw a 13-strikeout, two-walk no-hitter at Wrigley Field in his final start for the Philadelphia Phillies, who traded him later that week to Texas. On Thursday, days out from another trade deadline, the Chicago Cubs brought Hamels back to Wrigley – where they will lean on the veteran lefty to help lock down the National League Central title and carry them deep into October.

The Cubs reportedly struck a deal with the Rangers to acquire Hamels, 34, for low-level minor-leaguers. The deal, which would also include the Rangers sending cash to offset part of the $10 million in 2018 salary still owed to Hamels, was unofficial pending medical information.

But if the deal goes through, the Cubs will be banking on Hamels’ strong road numbers this season – 4-2 with a 2.93 ERA and an opponents’ OPS of .697 in 10 starts. He is 1-7 with a 6.41 ERA and an opponents’ OPS of .911 at the Rangers’ hitter-friendly Globe Life Park – and has an extensive postseason pedigree. For his career, Hamels, a four-time all-star, is 7-6 with a 3.48 ERA in October and was the MVP of both the NL Championship Series and World Series in 2008 as the ace of the Phillies.

“He has pitched in some pretty big games [and] he’s done very well,” Cubs Manager Joe Maddon told reporters Thursday, as the Hamels talks were heating up. “He’s a great competitor. He has great stuff. He competes, and he knows what he’s doing.”

Hamels carried a 3.61 ERA at the end of June, before a rough July (1-3, 11.12 ERA) sent his ERA climbing and his price dropping. His Rangers contract contained a partial no-trade clause, but the Cubs were not among the teams he could block. He has a $20 million team option for 2019, with a $6 million buyout.

Following a walk-off win Thursday, the Cubs (59-42) boasted the best record in the NL and held a 2 1/2-game lead in the Central over the Milwaukee Brewers, who had been in first place for most of the past two months until the Cubs caught and passed them two weeks ago. Earlier Thursday, the Brewers made a trade to acquire closer Joakim Soria from the Chicago White Sox, adding him to an already-formidable bullpen.

The Cubs, meantime, had been unable to solve their own rotation woes, with Yu Darvish out of action since late May and Tyler Chatwood seemingly incapable of completing six innings. Darvish and Chatwood were the centerpieces of the Cubs’ offseason, as the two free agent signees cost a total of $164 million. In addition, both Kyle Hendricks and Jose Quintana, holdovers from the 2017 rotation that helped carry the Cubs to the NLCS, have regressed.

In the midst of a relatively weak trade market for starting pitching, the Cubs were one of the teams pursuing Blue Jays lefty J.A. Happ, whom the New York Yankees acquired earlier Thursday from the Blue Jays.

Around the same time as the Yankees’ trade for Happ, Chatwood struggled through another rocky start at Wrigley, walking six Arizona Diamondbacks batters and failing to make it out of the fifth inning; the Cubs bailed him out with a walk-off win on an Anthony Rizzo home run.

The Cubs apparently had seen enough. By the end of the day, they had completed the deal for Hamels.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.