ShareThis Page
Sister delivers strike for Chicago White Sox in ceremonial first pitch |

Sister delivers strike for Chicago White Sox in ceremonial first pitch

Frank Carnevale
| Sunday, August 19, 2018 12:45 p.m

The Chicago White Sox brought in a some holy help for the ceremonial first pitch Saturday.

The ChiSox had Sister Mary Jo Sobieck of Marian Catholic High School from Chicago Heights, Ill. throw out the first pitch. She walked up to the mound, pointed to sky, bounced the ball off her arm and nailed it with a strike over the plate.

Was that a curve or changeup delivered to Chicago right-hander Lucas Giolito?

It was the school’s day at Guaranteed Rate Field with the school’s marching band also performing at the park.

The team posted a video of the pitch .

The school posted a video of Sister Sobieck practicing for her big pitch.

After the game White Sox manager Rick Renteria said it looks like she can play.

“She was talking to someone [before the pitch] and wanted to warm up,” Renteria said according to the Chicago Sun-Times . “She had a mitt and a ball. She gave him the mitt. She stepped back at about 45 feet and threw a bullet. I’m like, ‘Wait a minute.’ He threw it back to her and she fielded it barehanded. I was like, ‘OK, she looks like she can play a little bit.’ ”

The Sox though couldn’t win one for her, losing to the Royals, 3-1.

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Frank at 412-380-8511, or via Twitter @frnkstar.

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Frank at 412-380-8511, or via Twitter .

Categories: MLB
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.