ShareThis Page
Bengals’ Vontaze Burfict fined $112,000 for hits vs. Steelers |

Bengals’ Vontaze Burfict fined $112,000 for hits vs. Steelers

The Associated Press
Cincinnati Bengals linebacker Vontaze Burfict reacts in the first half against the Steelers on Sunday, Oct. 14, 2018, in Cincinnati.

NEW YORK — The NFL fined Bengals linebacker Vontaze Burfict $112,000 for multiple unnecessary roughness penalties in Cincinnati’s loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday.

The third-quarter plays involved Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown and running back James Conner. Burfict, who has been fined 11 times for more than $315,000 during his seven-year NFL career and was suspended for four games to begin this season for violating the league’s policy on performance enhances.

Burfict was fined for a helmet hit to Brown. Burfict previously served a three-game suspension for a hit on Brown during the 2016 playoffs.

His other fine, announced Saturday, came for a high hit on Conner.

There were calls for Burfict to be suspended as a repeat offender, but instead he was handed his biggest one-time fines.

Also fined:

• Bears linebacker Leonard Floyd, $30,080 for two incidents: $10,026 for unnecessary roughness and $20,054 for a hit on QB Brock Osweiler.

• Ravens linebacker Matthew Judon, $26,739 for unnecessary roughness.

• Seahawks safety Bradley McDougald $26,739 for unnecessary roughness.

• Broncos safety Darian Stewart, $26,739 for a horse-collar tackle.

• Eagles defensive lineman Michael Bennett, $20,054 for a hit on quarterback Eli Manning.

• Colts defensive end Kemoko Turay, $10,026 for unnecessary roughness.

• Giants linebacker Alec Ogletree, $10,026 for unnecessary roughness.

• Seahawks defensive end Quinton Jefferson, $10,026 for unnecessary roughness.

• Broncos wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders, $10,026 for taunting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.