Cleveland Browns win, Internet goes nuts |

Cleveland Browns win, Internet goes nuts

Joe Robbins/Getty Images
Terrance Mitchell of the Cleveland Browns celebrates his interception with fans during the fourth quarter against the New York Jets at FirstEnergy Stadium on Sept. 20, 2018 in Cleveland, Ohio. The Cleveland Browns defeated the New York Jets 21-17 for their first win in 635 days.
Cleveland Browns quarterback Baker Mayfield celebrates a 1-yard touchdown by running back Carlos Hyde during the second half of an NFL football game against the New York Jets, Thursday, Sept. 20, 2018, in Cleveland. The Browns won 21-17. (AP Photo/David Richard)

The Cleveland Browns might as well have just won the Super Bowl.

After a tie to start the season, a gut-wrenching Week 2 loss and a drought stretching back to Dec. 24, 2016, the stars aligned for the Browns Thursday night to finally get the “W” after a 21-17 victory over the New York Jets.

Or should we say, the stars aligned for rookie quarterback Baker Mayfield to lead the team to salvation.

After starting quarterback Tyrod Taylor went out with concussion-like symptoms just minutes to spare before the half, it was Baker time.

The former Oklahoma Sooner did not disappoint, obviously.

A half of football later and poor play by the Jets lifted the curse.

And that has folks crackin’ open the cold ones .

Keeping true to its promise, Bud Light rewarded faithful Browns fans with free beer.

But get a load of some of these other reactions to the Browns’ victory.

Gotta shout out the homies.

The butt of jokes, even in victory.

What’s that addage about seeing difficult tasks through?

Remember J.R. Smith going shirtless in the NBA Finals victory parade from a couple years ago?

Welp, he’s back at it.

Gotta love it.

Samson X Horne is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.