GoFundMe campaign launches to get Pitt product, Bills QB Nathan Peterman to retire |

GoFundMe campaign launches to get Pitt product, Bills QB Nathan Peterman to retire

Buffalo Bills quarterback Nathan Peterman (2) during the second half of an NFL football game Houston Texans, Sunday, Oct. 14, 2018, in Houston. (AP Photo/Michael Wyke)

Maybe this isn’t exactly why GoFundMe was created.

People — presumably Buffalo Bills fans — started a GoFundMe page to raise money to help quarterback Nathan Peterman leave town.

Peterman played for Pitt during the 2015 and 2016 seasons, helping the Panthers to consecutive 8-5 seasons and throwing for 308 yards, five touchdowns and no interceptions in the upset of national champion Clemson.

But he’s struggled as a pro, throwing multiple interceptions in four of his eight games, including five against the Los Angeles Chargers last year.

He was drafted by the Bills with a fifth-round selection in 2017 and was thrust into a starting role as a rookie. But he clearly wasn’t their quarterback of the future after they used the No. 7 overall pick this year on Josh Allen.

Allen wasn’t ready, so Peterman became the starter again this season, losing the job and regaining it after injuries to Allen (elbow) and 35-year-old Derek Anderson (concussion).

With the Bills, Peterman has thrown three touchdown passes, 12 interceptions and completed only 52.3 percent of his passes.

All of this must come as a shock to Oakland Raiders coach Jon Gruden, who told Peterman before the 2017 draft: “Someone is making a mistake not drafting you.”

Gruden, an NFL analyst for ESPN at the time, doubled down on those remarks in a piece he wrote for

Bills fans are not amused by Peterman’s lack of progress, which led to the GoFundMe page. Few are taking it seriously. Only $107 of its $1 million goal has been pledged in nearly a month.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.