NFL

NFL going back to the future with Los Angeles

Rob Rossi
By Rob Rossi
2 Min Read Sept. 2, 2015 | 11 years Ago
Go Ad-Free today

Los Angeles doesn't long for the NFL.

But commissioner Roger Goodell had made no secret he has hungry eyes for the City of Angels. His plan to turn the NFL into a $25 billion business by 2027 probably hinges on returning the league to its massive West Coast market.

“Neither the NFL nor Los Angeles has needed one another to the point that a strategic relocation would make economic sense for all involved,” said David Carter of the Sports Business Group.

Carter, who founded that Los Angeles-based consulting/marketing firm, said “all of that has changed” because of the tenuous stadium situations involving the St. Louis Rams, Oakland Raiders and San Diego Chargers. Each once considered Los Angeles its home.

Probably two will in the future. Recent NFL owners meetings focused on the league's future in Los Angeles.

The league reportedly has set a Feb. 15 relocation deadline, and a new stadium could be built for joint tenants for the 2018 season.

But the NFL is not looking for lame ducks.

The owners view a return to Los Angeles as the golden goose, though, exclusively as part of franchise relocation, Carter said. By moving existing teams to Los Angeles, the league can charge significant expansion fees for expected advancement into international markets such as England, Germany and perhaps Mexico.

The NFL does not have a team in three of North America's four most populated cities (Mexico City, Toronto and Los Angeles). That has been the rule since Christmas Eve 1994, when the Raiders and Rams last played in their respective Los Angeles-area stadiums.

For 1995, the first of 20 consecutive years without a team in Los Angeles, the NFL generated about $1.7 billion. The league has projected $12 billion in revenue for the 2015 season.

So, even if he loves L.A., does Goodell need the United States' second-biggest television market?

Its actions seemingly speak volumes.

“The NFL, for its part, wants to micromanage the process in order to ensure long-term stability,” Carter said.

“A successful relocation of a constrained franchise solves two of the league's problems while simultaneously increasing team and league revenue provided the team is well-run in a market as fickle as Los Angeles.”

Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at rrossi@tribweb.com or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.

Share

About the Writers

Article Details

Football towns

Whether through expansion or relocation, an NFL team likely will soon play home games in the following cities:

London

Commissioner Roger Goodell has not been shy about wanting his league to become England's newest hitmakers.

Frankfurt, Germany

Figuring out a TV rights package may be all that is keeping the league from settling in the German hub for commerce, culture and web traffic.

Toronto

“Hogtown” isn't only a hockey mecca. America's game generates big TV ratings in Canada's largest city.

Mexico City

Revenue-obsessed league owners know there is big money to be made in North America's most populated city.

St. Louis or San Diego

One of these NFL cities soon is going to lose its team. But history suggests it won't be that way for long.

100

Projected annual revenue (in millions) for international rights to Internet live-streaming games

4

Additional playoff games if postseason field expands from 12 to 16 teams

42

Worth (in billions) of TV deals with CBS, ESPN, FOX and NBC (all will have expired by 2022)

Push Notifications

Get news alerts first, right in your browser.

Enable Notifications

Enjoy TribLIVE, Uninterrupted.

Support our journalism and get an ad-free experience on all your devices.

  • TribLIVE AdFree Monthly

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Pay just $4.99 for your first month
  • TribLIVE AdFree Annually BEST VALUE

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Billed annually, $49.99 for the first year
    • Save 50% on your first year
Get Ad-Free Access Now View other subscription options