ShareThis Page
NFL notebook: Marrone rumored to be Jets next coach |

NFL notebook: Marrone rumored to be Jets next coach

| Sunday, January 4, 2015 6:57 p.m

• Doug Marrone, who opted out of his contract with the Bills on Wednesday and interviewed with the Jets on Saturday, reportedly could be their next coach by the end of the week. reported all signs point to Marrone as the Jets’ next coach. Sources said Marrone’s departure from the Bills might have been triggered by the decision to trade up and draft wide receiver Sammy Watkins.

• The Raiders requested permission to speak with Cowboys offensive coordinator Scott Linehan about their vacant head coaching position. Linehan, 51, posted an 11-25 record as Rams coach from 2006-08.

• The Redskins plan to interview former Broncos, Bills and Cowboys coach Wade Phillips this week for their vacant defensive coordinator position.

• Chris Ballard is expected to be named general manager of the Bears, according to published reports. Ballard has 12 years experience in personnel, including as a scout with the Bears.

• The fate of Falcons general manager Thomas Dimitroff remains uncertain as the team continues its search for a coach. Owner Arthur Blank reportedly has informed his personnel department, including Dimitroff and top aide Scott Pioli, that the new coach will have a say in the make-up of the front office.

• Cardinals wide receiver Jaron Brown fractured his shoulder blade in the 27-16 wild-card loss to the Panthers on Saturday and will be out four to six months.

• The Saints signed running back Tim Hightower to a reserve/future contract, giving him a chance to resurrect his career after a lingering knee injury. Hightower, 28, has been out of football since suffering a torn ACL and undergoing surgery in 2011 as a member of the Redskins.

— Wire reports

Categories: NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.