Raiders reportedly fear Martavis Bryant will be suspended again |

Raiders reportedly fear Martavis Bryant will be suspended again

Matt Rosenberg
Martavis Bryant listens to a reporter's question during a media conference Friday, April 27, 2018, in Alameda, Calif.

He’s no stranger to the NFL’s substance-abuse policy, and now former Steelers wide receiver Martavis Bryant reportedly could be on the hook for another suspension.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reported late Thursday that the Raiders feared a substance-abuse policy suspension “might be imminent” for Bryant.

The Steelers traded Bryant at the NFL Draft in April for the No. 79 overall pick.

Bryant missed the entire 2016 season with the Steelers after repeated violations of the substance-abuse policy.

In 2017, he had 50 catches for 603 yards and three touchdowns. He was outwardly unhappy with his role in the offense and was benched for a game against the Lions after calling out rookie JuJu Smith-Schuster on social media.

Bryant will be a free agent after the 2018 season.

Any suspension could be for a year or longer for Bryant. On April 27, he said during a news conference that he embraced a “clean slate and fresh start” in Oakland, citing a desire to have a long-term future with the Raiders.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.