ShareThis Page
Daily News roundup: Klingensmith Insurance tops Steel Towne |
Other Local

Daily News roundup: Klingensmith Insurance tops Steel Towne

Staff Reports
| Monday, June 17, 2013 1:06 a.m

Klingensmith Insurance raced to a 4-0 lead and held on for a 5-2 victory over Steel Towne Inn in Daily News League action Saturday.

Max Vickerman went six innings and allowed seven hits and two runs while striking out 10 to pick up the win. Andrew Krull gave up a pair of hits in the seventh but was able to pick up his first save of the year.

Shaun Murray did most of the damage at the plate for Klingensmith Insurance; he went 3 for 3, including a double, with three RBI. Dayne Holland, Matt Corner and Krull added a pair of singles to lead the Blue Jays’ 11-hit attack.

Kevin Hutchinson went five innings and allowed nine hits in picking up the loss. Steel Towne got two hits from Ryon Rocco and Antonio Palangio.

Quinn Construction 7, Clancy’s Pub 0 — Anthony Garofalo improved to 2-0 on the year as he surrendered two hits and no runs over six innings to help the Mudcats win their fourth straight to climb within 1 12 games of first-place Bowser. Quinn scored five runs off Clancy’s Pub starter Andy Hromoko in the top of the first.

Run-scoring singles by A.J. Olasz, Dom Francia, Ryan Kandsberger and Ryan Bytzura staked the Mudcats to a 5-0 lead. Francia went 3 for 4, and Bytzura added two singles.

Categories: Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.