David Bradshaw survives shaky round to hold lead at Fuhrer Invitational |
Other Local

David Bradshaw survives shaky round to hold lead at Fuhrer Invitational

Paul Schofield

David Bradshaw headed to the practice range after a lunch that followed his shaky third-round performance at the Frank B. Fuhrer Jr. Invitational on Tuesday.

The San Diego resident and Harpers Ferry, W.Va., native saw his comfortable five-shot lead after Day 1 shrink to two shots as he heads to the final round of the 72-hole, three-day event Wednesday at Pittsburgh Field Club.

He shot 2-over-par 72 during the third round and stands at 6-under par 204, two shots better than 2017 champion and Penn State assistant golf coach T.J. Howe and Syracuse native Daniel McCarthy. Howe and McCarthy are at 4-under 206, and Spencer Mellon is fourth at 2-under 202.

Bradshaw is looking to win his fourth title. His victories came in 2012, ’15 and ’16. His 2016 win came in a playoff with a walk-off hole-in-one.

Howe shot 1-under 69, and McCarthy had the best round of the day at 3-under 67. Four players are tied for fifth at even par.

“I have to straighten out my swing,” Bradshaw said. “A lot of my shots off the tee were going right. I’m usually more accurate off the tee, and my errant shots started on No. 1.”

Bradshaw, who began the round at 8-under, bogeyed Nos. 1 and 3 and saw Howe take the lead after his hot start with birdies on Nos. 3 and 4 and an eagle on No. 5.

“I didn’t swing well,” Bradshaw said. “It was a grind out there, but I hung in there. I’m still in the lead, and I made a few great saves coming down the stretch. It wasn’t a terrible day.”

Bradshaw said his best save came on No. 17, when he chipped to within 4 feet and made a tricky downhill putt.

“I ended the day with a good par on No. 18,” Bradshaw said. “I like being in the lead at tournaments. It’s better than being in second place. I have no problem leading because you kind of play smart and not take risks.”

There were only five golfers who shot under par during the third round. McCarthy, Howe, Matt Schall at 2-under, Michael Gligic and Penn-Trafford graduate Dan Obremski, each at 1-under.

“The greens were lightning fast, the fastest I’ve seen then,” Obremski said after a roller-coaster round that included five birdies and four bogeys. “I hope I can make a move up the board. Anything is possible. I hope to go low. I believe a 61 is possible.”

Obremski is 11th at 4-over.

In 12th place is Franklin Regional senior Palmer Jackson, the only amateur in the field. Amateur Will Wears, the grandson of the late Arnold Palmer, pulled out of the tournament. Jackson is guaranteed the top amateur prize of pro shop credit.

“There is no disadvantage for me playing in this tournament,” Jackson said after he shot even-par 70. “This will help me, and I hope to learn something from watching all the good players here.

“I didn’t hit it that bad on the front nine. I just got a couple tough breaks. I made a couple great par saves on the back nine.”

Jackson had three bogeys on the front nine and three birdies on the back nine. He sits at 4-over (214).

The final round is scheduled for Wednesday, and tournament officials moved the starting times to 7 a.m. because of rain in the forecast.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.