Irwin martial arts instructor Morgart up for national award |
Other Local

Irwin martial arts instructor Morgart up for national award

Karen Kadilak Karen Kadilak
Martial arts instructor John Morgart, Jr. poses with one of his students, Melissa Pistella, 11, of Wilkins.
Martial arts instructor John Morgart, Jr. poses with Chuck Norris, whose system he is studying.
John Morgart Jr., a resident of Irwin, is the creator of his own form of martial arts.

A novice martial arts instructor from Irwin is up for an impressive honor.

John Morgart, Jr., 25, is one of 22 nominees for the 2018 Greatmats National Martial Arts Instructor of the Year Award.

Brett Hart, a spokesman for the specialty flooring company in Wisconsin, said the competition is designed to recognize instructors who have served as positive influences in their communities through the demonstration of service, integrity and quality. They are nominated by community members, colleagues and clients.

Voting began Nov. 15 and ends Nov. 29 to narrow the field to two finalists.

Greatmats will announce the winner Dec. 14, with the winner being offered $250 in Greatmats martial arts mats.

Morgart, who has instructed only one student since Feb. 2017, said he was shocked to be nominated.

Morgart has a black belt in Tang Soo Do and is studying Chun Kuk Do, or the Chuck Norris System. He is in the process of creating his own system, Wei Son Do, and is considering opening a school.

Melissa Pistella, 11, of Wilkins, a Woodland Hills sixth grader, said Morgart has taught her different defenses.

“He’s a really good instructor,” she said.

Georgeann Pistella said her daughter was bullied in school.

“(She) took a lot on the bus (and) didn’t fight back,” Georgeann Pistella said.

Melissa Pistella said Morgart taught her how to respect people and treat them nicely.

To vote, go to

Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.