ShareThis Page
Kenyan Kirwa returns in his bid for Pittsburgh Marathon supremacy |
Other Local

Kenyan Kirwa returns in his bid for Pittsburgh Marathon supremacy

Karen Price
| Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:51 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Kenyan James Kirwa separates himself from Stephen Njoroge during the 2013 Dick's Sporting Goods Pittsburgh Marathon Sunday, May 5, 2013.

James Kirwa promised after winning the Pittsburgh Marathon for the second year in a row in 2013 that he would be back to defend his title.

On Sunday, Kirwa will attempt to become the first person to win the Pittsburgh Marathon for the third time. He will have competition. The native of Kenya won last year in 2:13:37, faster than his 2012 winning time of 2:14:09 but slightly slower than his personal best of 2:12:54 set in Des Moines in 2011. At least two of his competitors, Ethiopians Gebo Burka and Negash Abebe Duki, are capable of running faster, with personal records of 2:10:18 and 2:11:14, respectively.

The men’s record for the Pittsburgh Marathon is held by John Kagwe, who won with a time of 2:10:24 in 1995.

When the Pittsburgh Marathon returned in 2009 after a five-year absence, Kassahun Kabiso was the fastest man at 2:22:51, the slowest time by a winner in the history of the race.

The total prize purse that year was $34,600. It is now a record $47,000 for the 26.2-mile race alone, with $8,000 going to both the men’s and women’s winners. The more money offered, the more competitive the field has become.

“It’s just adding that extra incentive in terms of cash,” Pittsburgh Marathon CEO Patrice Matamoros said. “We’re also the largest prize purse (among spring marathons) after Boston on the East Coast. We have a really competitive prize purse.”

The top women competing include Clara Santucci, who ran for West Virginia University, lives in Dillimore and was the first American woman to cross the finish line at the 2013 Chicago Marathon. Her personal best is 2:29:54, and she will be up against Ethiopian Yeshimebet Bifa, who set her PR at the 2013 Seoul International Marathon with a time of 2:26:18. The women’s record for the Pittsburgh Marathon is 2:29:50, set by Margaret Groos in 1988.

Last year’s winner, Mary Akor, crossed the finish line in 2:37:35.

In the men’s field for the half-marathon, defending champion Julius Kogo is back after setting a record in 2013 with a time of 1:02:32, and the women’s side will be led by 2011 half-marathon and 2012 marathon winner Malika Mejdoub.

The half-marathon overall prize purse of $34,500 is also the biggest in the history of the race. Including extra incentives for American runners, the marathon has added nearly $100,000 to its purse since its return.

“The fields for the marathon and half-marathon are a little deeper, and I think part of that is that the message that the prize purse has increased has gotten out to agents and athletes,” said Ryan Lamppa of Running USA. “It’s not going to happen overnight where you get really deep fields, but they are building on that. And athletes and agents talk about events. If you take care of the athlete and it’s a good experience, that helps sell the event, too. Boston, New York and Chicago all had to start someplace, and I think the Pittsburgh Marathon is heading toward that level where they’re up there with Houston and Twin Cities.”

Karen Price is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at or via Twitter @KarenPrice_Trib.

Karen Price is a former freelancer.

Categories: Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.