Archive

ShareThis Page
Love of game pulls ex-Hempfield state champion Katie Miller back to golf course | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Love of game pulls ex-Hempfield state champion Katie Miller back to golf course

257328imagejpeg01

Former Hempfield golf standout Katie Miller is feeling good nowadays, but beware if you get invited to play a round with the former All-ACC golfer at North Carolina. If she digs into your bag to try out a club, and it feels good, it might be leaving with her.

“Two years ago before the state amateur championship, I took out my cousin Andrew’s putter, it felt good and I said, ‘I’m going to take this,’ ” Miller said. “Every time I take a club from one of them, I end up having a good week.”

Miller, 33, will drop her bag of Callaway’s, Andrew’s putter, and her uncle’s 3-wood at St. Louis’ Norwood Hills Country Club this weekend and compete in the 32nd U.S. Women’s Mid-Amateur that runs through Thursday.

Miller, a former three-time PIAA champion, punched her ticket to Norwood Hills last month by winning a qualifier at Nemacolin Woodlands.

Her journey to St. Louis marks the next leg of an already brilliant career but with a new twist, as a mid-amateur.

Mid-amateur golfers can be no younger than 25 years old and have no intention of turning pro. It’s the passion for the sport that drives a mid-am golfer, and that’s exactly what Miller had left in the tank having taken a few years off as a pro playing on the LPGA Futures Tour.

“What got me out of playing (professionally) is it’s pretty difficult out there for the women,” said Miller, who has earned a top-10 mid-am ranking from GobalGolfPost.com. “If you’re not one of the top 30 in the world, you’re not making a living.”

The golf bug bit Miller while she was working in television for the NHL’s Carolina Hurricanes. The rush of connecting on the perfect drive and the urge to compete again became too much to ignore. One day after work, she rushed home, flipped on her computer and started the lengthy process of applying for amateur status.

“The application is way more detailed that I imagined,” Miller said. “It was purgatory until they tell you you’re an amateur again. Then you can go and compete. I was fortunate to get that back.”

Working a career in broadcast journalism, she turned to running races and half marathons as a way to open up and refresh her batteries. It was almost as if each race was a cleansing process. Miller admits distance running was never her thing but she found that after a few runs it was almost therapeutic. A lot of the miles running were spent thinking about how she can improve her golf game.

“There’s definitely a peace of mind through running,” Miller said. “I think that it has helped me on the golf course.”

One of the most critical areas Miller had to work out in her game had nothing to do with swinging a club. It was patience. The battle every competitive golfer goes through. To lay-up or drive the green.

“It still goes back that I found more patience,” Miller said. “When I’m truly in the moment and it’s crazy, it goes back to that patience and hitting that shot as best I can and making a good plan.”

Miller’s plan is on track. Since gaining her mid-am status in 2013, she has reached the quarterfinals in the 2015 and 2016 Women’s Amateur Four-Ball and the 2016 U.S. Women’s Mid-Am.

“I don’t know if its necessarily a comeback,” Miller said. “The talent level, even at this level, is incredibly strong. At this point you’re playing because you love the game, most everyone here has a career and a life outside of golf.”

William Whalen is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.