Soccer a release for Sewickley Academy grad Civitarese |
Other Local

Soccer a release for Sewickley Academy grad Civitarese

When Albert Civitarese got to Washington and Lee University in the fall of 2011, he learned very quickly the importance of time management.

As a biology pre-med major, the 2011 graduate of Sewickley Academy knew that much of his time would be devoted to his studies, but he also had a large time commitment as a member of the men’s soccer team.

Luckily, the faculty at Washington and Lee — an NCAA Division III school — were understanding of the demands that in-season athletes face, especially for freshmen, Civitarese said.

“They really made the transition bearable and easy to overcome,” he said. “But as I say that, there were times where the night would end at 2 a.m. and I’d be up at 8 a.m. to meet with a professor at office hours.”

Now in his senior year, Civitarese said he credits his time at Sewickley Academy for giving him a leg up on some of his teammates when it came to learning how to balance his time between academics and athletics.

While the time-share was difficult to manage at first, having soccer in his schedule became an important aspect of balancing his life, he said.

“Some of the people I talked to have described college as a time for academics, athletics and social life.” Civitarese said. “I always knew that when I needed a release, I could find it in soccer, whether it was for practice or training. I always looked at is as a release to get away from the academics for a few hours.”

On the field, he took full advantage of that release and started in goal for the Generals from his sophomore year on after serving in a backup role as a freshman.

During Civitarese’s three seasons as a starter, the Generals had a record of 32-12-10 with 27 shutouts and reached the semifinals of the Old Dominion Athletic Conference tournament each year.

It took some time for Civitarese to adjust to playing his position on the collegiate level, but once he learned to trust his 6-foot-3 frame, his confidence in challenging shots and controlling play in the box blossomed, along with his play.

He was forced to make adjustments as a senior as well when first-year coach Michael Singleton implemented a new attacking offense, transitioning away from the pack it in style of play the Generals had been playing in recent years.

“The biggest thing was to be on the same page as my defenders, and they made my life pretty easy,” Civitarese said. “Although there weren’t a higher number of shots, the quality of chances I faced was much higher. It wasn’t necessarily an adjustment, but every game I went into I had to keep that in mind. The goals that were scored on me were very rarely a defensive breakdown, but rather the ball fell their way.”

In Civitarese’s final season, the Generals were eliminated in the ODAC semifinals in a 5-1 loss to Roanoke College.

As he transitions into a season of applying to grad schools, he carries with him much more than just the memories of his time as a collegiate athlete.

“Playing a sport in both high school and college teaches you a lot of values that you may not appreciate until it comes to interviewing and things like that,” Civitarese said. “It’s invaluable for not only professional but personal life. It’s been something that I look forward to each and every day. To have something that can distract you from the academic difficulties and other challenges you may face is something that I’ve come to really appreciate.”

Gary Horvath is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @GHorvath_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.