ShareThis Page
West Point Major 11s fall short in opener |
Other Local

West Point Major 11s fall short in opener

| Friday, July 31, 2015 10:09 p.m
Evan Sanders | Trib Total Media
West Point's Lauren Bisignani, reacts after receiving the first pitch from Mark Boyle, Excela Health Community Outreach Coordinator, during a dedication for Excela Health Field at the West Point Little League Complex on Friday, July 31, 2015.
Evan Sanders | Trib Total Media
West Point's Abby Martin (left) and Lily Schmadel (left center) along with Ray Mello (center) present plaques to Excela Health Community Outreach Coordinators Mark Boyle (right center) and Jean Hacha (right) during a dedication for Excela Health Field on Friday, July 31, 2015, at the West Point Little League Complex.

Host West Point got off to a slow start in its bid for a state softball title in the Major 11 division Friday.

The local team dropped an 11-1 decision to Upper Providence and fell into the loser’s bracket of the Pennsylvania Little League state tournament.

Newberry beat Pittston, 22-7, in the other opening-round game.

West Point will play Pittston at 1:30 p.m. Saturday at Ray Mello Field.


Upper Providence 10, West Point 3 — Jake Books hit two home runs, including a grand slam, and had five RBIs to lead Upper Providence to the Major 11’s State Tournament victory in Plymouth Meeting.

Chase Sickenberger went 2 for 3 with a double and an RBI for West Point, and teammates Nick Wile and Ryan Firmstone also hit a double apiece in the loss.

West Point will play DuBois in a loser’s bracket game 10 a.m. Saturday.

Categories: Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.