ShareThis Page
Former Oakmont pro Bob Ford headed to St. Andrews for Senior Open |
Other Local

Former Oakmont pro Bob Ford headed to St. Andrews for Senior Open

| Monday, July 23, 2018 7:36 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review

Former Oakmont County Club professional Bob Ford will get to compete for a Champions Tour major at the home of golf.

Ford qualified for the Senior British Open, set to begin Thursday at The Old Course at St. Andrews, Scotland.

One of seven players to advance Monday at Ladybank Golf Club in Fife, Scotland, Ford shot 1-under 70 and emerged from a five-man playoff that awarded four spots. He made six birdies and five bogeys and moved on with amateur Ryan Howison, Mark Ridley and Gary Wolstenholme on the first extra hole.

Ford, the pro at storied Oakmont for 37 years and the 2017 winner of the USGA’s prestigious Bob Jones Award, retired last fall. He continues to work at Seminole Golf Club in Juno Beach, Fla.

Senior Open headliners include defending champion Bernhard Langer, Colin Montgomerie and Tom Watson.

The field will include a number of players who have become television personalities in the game, including The Golf Channel’s Sir Nick Faldo, Gary Koch and Brandel Chamblee, who shared medalist honors Monday at a qualifier at Scotscraig Golf Club in Tayport, Scotland.

Bill Beckner is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill at or via Twitter @BillBeckner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.