Archive

ShareThis Page
Ian Bangor takes West Penn Mid-Am title | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Ian Bangor takes West Penn Mid-Am title

197937DmSZ7HNX4AE5pj
Ian Bangor/WPGA photo

Ian Bangor overcame intense heat and a talented field to win the 33rd Western Pennsylvania Golf Association Mid-Amateur title Tuesday at South Hills Country Club.

Bangor, a Sewickley Academy and Carnegie Mellon graduate, followed a 70 with a final-round 66 for a 6-under total and a two-shot win over Erik Bertrand and Drew Deimel.

Bangor made four birdies on his closing nine and seven for the round to seal the win. He did not make a single birdie on the back nine in the first round.

Bertrand, of Chartiers Country Club, and Deimel, of The Kahkwa Club, shot matching 69s in each round to tie at 4-under.

David Brown, Jim Ellis and Tyler Cozad tied for fourth at minus-3. Cozad closed with a 67.

First-round leader Michael Gielarowski, who opened with a course-record 65 and a three-shot lead, was 10 shots worse in round two and finished seventh.

Nathan Smith tied for eight at even par and Sean Knapp, fresh off a runner-up at the U.S. Senior Amateur, tied for 30th at 8-over.

Bill Beckner is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill at bbeckner@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BillBeckner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.