ShareThis Page
Opening day of deer season might change in 2019 |

Opening day of deer season might change in 2019

Everybody Adventures
| Saturday, December 22, 2018 12:36 a.m
Wikimedia Commons
The timing of the first day of deer season in Pennsylvania hasn't changed in more than half a century. But it may in 2019.

A green light will set this train in motion. Whether it’s got the steam to roll far remains unclear, though.

Opening day of Pennsylvania’s statewide firearms deer season was the Monday after Thanksgiving this year. There’s no surprise there.

That’s the way things have been since 1963.

But at least some Pennsylvania Game Commissioners want to change opening day in 2019 to the Saturday after Thanksgiving.

In fact, commissioner Jim Daley of Butler County said he’s hoping agency staff will propose just such an opener when asking board members to give preliminary approval to 2019-20 seasons and bag limits in January.

If they don’t, he said he might amend their proposal, then or in April, when board members give final approval to the slate of seasons, to bring it about.

“I truly believe it is the right thing to do and is likely long overdue,” Daley said.

Participation is the reason.

Hunter numbers — in Pennsylvania and across the nation — are declining. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the number of hunters in America decreased by 16 percent between 2011 and ’16, to 11.7 million. That’s the lowest total in at least 25 years.

Bryan Burhans, executive director of the commission, said one problem more than any other is driving that trend. In survey after survey, hunters said lack of time is why they stopped hunting.

“It had nothing to do with game. It has nothing to do with anything else. It’s just time,” Burhans said.

Opening deer season on a Saturday, when students from junior high to college are out of class, and people are more likely to be off work, could put more people in the woods, said commissioner Stanley Knick of Luzerne County.

Fears that changing opening day would hurt deer populations are unfounded, too, said Matthew Schnupp, director of the commission’s bureau of wildlife management.

A Saturday opener might shift the timing of the deer harvest, by day, he noted. But it wouldn’t likely change the total kill dramatically.

And if that did occur, he said, biologists could tweak the number of antlerless licenses to accommodate it.

That makes things pretty clear, said commissioner Michael Mitrick of York County.

“There’s not a reasonable argument to keep it a Monday opener. There really isn’t a reasonable argument, other than that’s it’s always been,” he said.

Some, though, cling to that tradition.

The commission surveyed hunters in 2014 and ’17, asking them about the idea of a Saturday opener. Hunters opposed the idea by about a 2-to-1 margin.

That’s largely related to age, though. The older a hunter is, the more likely they are to want to maintain the Monday opener, said Schnupp.

Eighty percent of hunters 64 and older oppose moving opening day, for example. But only 50 percent of those younger than 25 do, according to the surveys.

Those numbers don’t mean much to Daley.

He admitted most of the hunters voicing opinions oppose any change to opening day.

“But that’s not the group I want to attract,” Daley said.

Changing opening day to Saturday won’t cause any of those hunters to quit the sport, he said. But it might bring in or bring back a lot of new or lapsed people.

“I guess that’s the thing I come back to is, why wouldn’t we do it?” Daley asked.

Commissioner Scott Foradora of Clearfield County seems on board with the notion.

He wasn’t initially. When commissioners first talked about changing opening day a few months ago. He was “neutral,” he said.

But, he said, “my test case is my two kids.” One son is in college, the other in high school. Class schedules, work and sports are competing for their time and forcing them away from hunting, he said.

A Saturday opener would allow them and other young people to stay in the game, he added. Many older hunters might not agree, he admitted.

“But that’s not our future. The kids are our future,” Foradora said.

It will take at least five votes on the eight-member board to bring about a change, though. And some don’t seem supportive.

Commissioner Brian Hoover of Chester County said he would support a Saturday opening day if lawmakers legalize Sunday hunting first. Otherwise, he said, he’s not sure it makes sense.

He worries about another “political issue,” too.

The older hunters opposed to a Saturday opener are the ones most likely to voice displeasure to their lawmakers, he said. And those lawmakers — always wary of alienating to potential voters — might wind up fighting the commission, he suggested.

“I think we need to test the political waters on a Saturday opener” before advancing the idea, Hoover said.

“I’d be more apt to vote for it if (lawmakers) said, we’re behind you 100 percent,” agreed commission president Tim Layton of Somerset County.

Burhans said the lawmakers who have spoken publicly about a Saturday opener so far have all supported the idea.

But, to be sure, between now and the board’s Jan. 27-29 meeting, commission staff will reach out to the majority and minority chairman of the Senate and House of Representatives game and fisheries committees. If they support a Saturday opener, or at least don’t oppose it, this train may at least start down the tracks.

Daley wants to jump start it and see what happens.

“Time will tell,” he said.

Bob Frye is the editor. Reach him at 412-216-0193 or See other stories, blogs, videos and more at

Article by Bob Frye, Everybody Adventures,

Copyright © 535media, LLC

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.