Archive

ShareThis Page
Dove hunters disappearing, quail already gone | TribLIVE.com
Outdoors

Dove hunters disappearing, quail already gone

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, November 4, 2014 10:30 p.m.

It’s no mirage: There are far fewer dove hunters in the fields than in years past, and no quail at all.

Two new surveys revealed that.

In the mid-1980s, Pennsylvania was home to about 150,000 dove hunters. Now it has about 30,000, said Ian Gregg, the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s game bird section supervisor.

If the birds are an “underutilized resource,” it’s not for lack of opportunity or doves, he said. Seasons have expanded over time — from 70 days last year to 90 this one — all while dove populations have held steady or increased, he said.

To find out what’s going on, the commission did a survey of dove hunters last summer. It found that 37 percent of all dove hunting occurs in wildlife management units 5B and 5C, which stretch from York County to Philadelphia. Units 1A and 2D in Western Pennsylvania were in the second tier in terms of hunter numbers, with units 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C in the third.

Sixty-four percent of all hunters hunt on private land only 19 percent hunt only public land, and 14 percent utilize both.

Forty-one percent rated their overall experience as good or very good. That’s low compared to how waterfowl, turkey and pheasant hunters have rated their experiences in past surveys, Gregg said. Thirty-four percent of dove hunters say their hunting is fair, while 25 percent said it’s poor.

Ninety-four percent said they hunt doves because the sport is “very important to me.” That was the top motivation revealed. Eight-nine percent say they hunt to be with family and friends, and 75 percent do so out of tradition.

Hunters also were asked what it would take for them to hunt more often. More doves was the top answer. Others cited having more places to hunt, more personal free time and the ability to hunt on Sundays.

As for quail, it appears there are none left within the state’s borders. The commission contracted researchers from Penn State University to look for birds this summer. They did call count surveys along eight routes across the state — three in Greene County accounting for all those in Western Pennsylvania — where quail had been reported surviving in years past. Each route was surveyed two to three times over June and July.

Researchers did not detect any birds anywhere, Gregg said.

Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at bfrye@tribweb.com or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.