Hungarian partridges might return to Pennsylvania’s hunting scene |

Hungarian partridges might return to Pennsylvania’s hunting scene

Wiki Commons
Hungarian partridges haven’t exist in Pennsylvania for decades, but they might soon.

A failed experiment decades old is, potentially, returning to Pennsylvania’s hunting scene.

Say hello to the Hungarian partridge.

The birds — also called Huns or gray partridges — are native to Europe. They were brought to the United States in the early 1900s and released in states all around the country in an attempt to create huntable populations.

Huns are a relatively small bird — about a foot long and weighing three quarters of a pound —– that live in coveys, like quail. They are not particularly hard to kill, so long as you can get close enough.

They’re notoriously wild flushers, though, often taking wing far from hunters and dogs.

“The Game Commission specifically made efforts to stock Hungarian partridges within the state in the 1920s and 1930s to increase small game populations,” said Randy Shoup, chief of the agency’s bureau of wildlife protection. “But those were unsuccessful.”

The birds did take root elsewhere. A dozen or so western states hold seasons on them.

But there are no Hungarian partridges in Pennsylvania any more.

“And there haven’t been for a long time,” Shoup said.

Some bird dog owners would like to change that.

The commission recently received a request from the public, seeking permission to release the birds for hunting and dog training purposes.

Game Commissioners seem inclined to grant that request.

But two things must occur.

First, Shoup said, Hungarian partridges are still officially classified as a game bird in Pennsylvania. Commissioners need to take them off that list.

Second, they need to add them to a second list, one specifying which birds are OK to release for hunting and dog training. Right now, it includes only ringneck pheasants, bobwhite quail, mallards and chukkar partridges.

“Essentially, (Huns) would no longer be a game bird and people who wished to utilize it for dog training purposes or hunting could do that,” Shoup said.

Biologists in the agency’s bureau of wildlife management have no problem with that, nor do game bird breeders, Shoup said.

“It’s kind of a no brainer, right?” said commission president Tim Layton of Somerset County. “It’s along the lines of a chukkar. They’re not going to establish populations on the game lands.”

It’s unlikely dog trainers and bird hunters will be turning Huns out all over, added Rich Palmer, deputy director for field operations for the commission and a bird dog owner.

“I actually wouldn’t expect them to be used too heavily because they’re harder to raise. So they’re actually more expensive than a chukkar,” he said.

“They’re approaching pheasant prices.”

Still, expect commissioners to address the issue at their next meeting, set for July 30 and 31.

“We have no thought of, 20 years from now, getting into the Hungarian partridge business to replace something else,” said commissioner Brian Hoover of Chester County. “I have no problem with it.”

Bob Frye is the editor. Reach him at 412-216-0193 or [email protected] See other stories, blogs, videos and more at

Article by Bob Frye, Everybody Adventures,

Copyright © 535media, LLC

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.