Archive

Penguins’ Ryan Reaves says he’s offered to fight Capitals’ Tom Wilson | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins’ Ryan Reaves says he’s offered to fight Capitals’ Tom Wilson

Chris Adamski

Hours before making his return to the lineup Friday after three games as a healthy scratch, Penguins winger Ryan Reaves floated something of a challenge.

Though the enforcer hadn’t fought Capitals’ pugilist Tom Wilson during the Oct. 11 or Nov. 10 meetings between the teams, Reaves made sure it was known that wasn’t his doing.

“I mean, the offer has been out there,” Reaves said. “But yeah, it just hasn’t happened. I am not gonna go and chase a guy out on the ice and put my team in the penalty box, maybe. So if it happens, it happens. I just have to make sure I play my game.”

On the same first-period shift when he mixed it up with Capitals star Alex Ovechkin, Reaves appeared to approach Wilson during a sequence in the Penguins’ zone. The two skated together but did not drop the gloves.

According to hockeyfights.com, Wilson has the second-most fighting majors in the NHL this season (10). Reaves is tied for fourth with six.

Fight or no fight, Reaves appreciates the animosity between longtime rivals.

“Lot of love out on the ice, you know?” Reaves deadpanned. “Two teams that like to like each other, lot of handshakes and smiles.

“No, obviously a physical, in-your-face game.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.


872672758
Getty Images
WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 10: Ryan Reaves #75 of the Pittsburgh Penguins and Liam O'Brien #87 of the Washington Capitals fight during the first period at Capital One Arena on November 10, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.