NHL players want Sidney Crosby on their team more than anyone |

NHL players want Sidney Crosby on their team more than anyone

Jonathan Bombulie
The Penguins' Sidney Crosby gets off a backhanded shot during the first period against the Blues on Sunday, Feb. 11, 2018, in St. Louis.

PHILADELPHIA – There’s no one NHL players would rather go into battle with than Penguins captain Sidney Crosby.

As part of the NHL Players Association annual poll on hockey issues, more than 500 players were asked, “If you need to win one game, who is the No. 1 player (any position) you would want on your team?”

Crosby was the runaway winner with 43.7 percent of the vote, finishing ahead of Connor McDavid (15.3 percent), Carey Price (9.7), Patrick Kane (3.7) and Erik Karlsson (3.4).

The only more lopsided poll result regarding current events came when players were asked who is the toughest player in the league. Former Penguins winger Ryan Reaves took 44.7 percent of the votes, ahead of Milan Lucic (14.8).

Crosby was the top vote getter in a variety of categories, ranging from the most difficult to play against to best team player to best role model. He was also voted the player who would make the best coach once he retires.

In recognition of the 50th anniversary of the NHLPA, players were also asked some historical questions.

Wayne Gretzky was named best forward of all-time in a landslide (72.7), but the next three spots were filled by Penguins – Mario Lemieux (11.3), Crosby (4.9) and Jaromir Jagr (3.1).

For some perspective on the age of today’s NHL, current players said their favorite players growing up were Peter Forsberg, Steve Yzerman, Joe Sakic and Nicklas Lidstrom.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.