Archive

ShareThis Page
Late-season game could have implications for Penguins | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Late-season game could have implications for Penguins

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, March 28, 2018 7:18 p.m
gtrpens1032918
Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Matt Murray (30) deflects a shot by Detroit Red Wings center Dylan Larkin (71) during the third period of an NHL hockey game Tuesday, March 27, 2018, in Detroit. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
gtrpens2032918
Pittsburgh Penguins center Sidney Crosby waits on the face off during the first period of an NHL hockey game against the Detroit Red Wings, Tuesday, March 27, 2018, in Detroit. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
gtrpens3032918
Pittsburgh Penguins defenseman Kris Letang (58) passes the puck away from Detroit Red Wings center Frans Nielsen (51) during the second period of an NHL hockey game Tuesday, March 27, 2018, in Detroit. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)

Maybe it’s coming Thursday night.

Maybe it will have to wait until the Thursday after that.

Perhaps it already happened last Sunday afternoon, and we just didn’t know it at the time.

Given the way the last few weeks of their schedule shake out, there’s a pretty good chance the Penguins will have staged a playoff preview against their future first-round opponent within the final seven games of the regular season.

Thursday night, it’s New Jersey. The Thursday after that, it’s Columbus. Last Sunday was Philadelphia.

Unless the Penguins make a late charge past first-place Washington in the Metropolitan Division standings or a late plunge into a wild-card spot, they’ll open the postseason against the Devils, Blue Jackets or Flyers.

This scheduling quirk prompts an obvious question: Does the outcome of a late-season game really have any bearing on a postseason series once it starts?

Is it a chance for the winning team to send a message or is it a result that is quickly forgotten once the games start to really count?

A quick survey of the Penguins locker room showed a variety of opinions.

Coach Mike Sullivan, for instance, had no use for any talk of message sending. After a brutal 5-2 loss at Detroit on Tuesday night, his focus is set squarely on merely getting his team into the tournament.

“I just think the points are important, and we’ve got to try to win regardless of who our opponent is,” he said. “There’s obviously a rivalry over the years that’s built up with these divisional teams. Every night, the stakes are high for both sides. I think the points are most important. We’re trying to put ourselves in the best possible position.”

Carl Hagelin, meanwhile, said he thought this a great time of year to send a message, but not to a potential playoff foe.

“Within this locker room, we need to send the message to each other that we’re ready to go,” he said. “We need to be better.”

Whether players or coaches buy into the idea of setting a tone or not, a curious bit of anecdotal evidence says they should.

For each of the last five years, the final regular-season meeting between the Penguins and their first-round playoff opponent gave a good preview of how the series would go.

• On April 4 last season, Jake Guentzel had a goal and an assist as the Penguins cruised past Columbus, 4-1. Eight days later, the Penguins began a five-game series victory over the Blue Jackets. Guentzel had five goals in the series, including a Game 3 hat trick.

• On March 27, 2016, the Penguins beat the New York Rangers, 3-2, in overtime on a Sidney Crosby goal. Seventeen days later, the Penguins opened a five-game victory over the Rangers. Crosby had three goals and eight points in the series.

• In 2015, the Rangers hung a 5-2 beating on the Penguins in the final regular-season meeting between the teams and went on to win the first-round playoff series in five games. In 2014, the Penguins managed a 2-1 win over Columbus in late March before dispatching the Blue Jackets in six games once the postseason started. In 2013, the Penguins blanked the Islanders 2-0 on March 30 then won a playoff series between the teams in six games.

It’s hardly scientific, but the evidence suggests these late-season meetings are indeed meaningful.

That’s fine with defenseman Olli Maatta.

The way he sees it, whether the Penguins view the late-season games as an important postseason preview or not, they’re going to play them with playoff-style intensity anyway.

“I think you want to play these games as hard as you can, and I think it comes automatically,” Maatta said. “You don’t need any extra motivation there. You see the standings. You know those games are huge.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.