Penguins to relinquish rights to defense prospect Connor Hall |

Penguins to relinquish rights to defense prospect Connor Hall

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Connor Hall, a defenseman taken in the third round of the NHL Draft, showed good two-way skills in his first day on the ice at the Penguins' development camp.
Getty Images
Connor Hall reacts after being selected in the third round by the Penguins during the NHL Draft on Saturday, June 25, 2016, in Buffalo, N.Y.

The Penguins will not sign oft-injured prospect Connor Hall, relinquishing their rights to the physical defenseman chosen in the third round of the 2016 draft.

Hall will go back into the prospect pool for the 2018 NHL Draft, having failed to sign a deal before a June 1 deadline.

The move isn’t a surprise because of Hall’s lengthy injury history.

When the Penguins chose Hall with the 77th pick in 2016, he was described as a throwback defenseman with a strong physical game and enough puck-moving skills to register as a strong pro prospect.

However, he has played a total of 103 regular-season games over the last three years for the OHL’s Kitchener Rangers, including just 17 in 2016-17, because of surgeries to both shoulders and a broken jaw.

It’s common for NHL teams to relinquish the draft rights of oft-injured players, but it’s not a decision that comes without risk. The Penguins did not sign 2007 fifth-round pick Jake Muzzin in large part because of his injury history, and Muzzin became a standout defenseman with the Los Angeles Kings.

Hall’s departure leaves the Penguins prospect pool even thinner on defense.

Top Wilkes-Barre/Scranton defenseman Lukas Bengtsson and Andrey Pedan have left the organization to sign with European clubs. Zach Lauzon, their second-round pick in 2017, was limited to 25 games this season with Rouyn-Noranda of the QMJHL because of a shoulder injury.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.