ShareThis Page
Penguins Prediction Rewind: Antti Niemi flames out in short stint with team |

Penguins Prediction Rewind: Antti Niemi flames out in short stint with team

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Penguins goaltender Antti Niemi makes a save on the Sabres’ Matt Moulson in the first period Tuesday, Sept. 19, 2017 at Pegula Ice Arena in State College.

Note: Last summer, beat writer Jonathan Bombulie made a series of predictions leading up to the start of the 2017-18 season. Some of them were hilariously off the mark. In this series, Bombulie will explain what he was thinking and where his logic went off course.


Antti Niemi will play more than 25 games as Matt Murray’s back-up.


— Niemi’s struggles over the past two seasons might have been caused by Dallas’ leaky defense rather than any personal shortcomings.

— In a little more than a season in the NHL, Murray has missed time with a concussion, a broken hand and a torn hamstring. If that trend doesn’t change, Niemi will be pressed into action whether coach Mike Sullivan likes it or not.

— Too many things would have to happen to keep Niemi under 25 games played. Chances are Niemi will play around 30 games and will probably be pretty decent.


A sample of Facebook comments:

— “I wasn’t a fan of this move, it’s like having Landry Jones as your back-up for (Ben Roethlisberger). Not expecting him to win many games but hope he surprises me.”

— “Murray is a young Vezina-caliber goalie. If he stays healthy, he should be starting around 65 games. There is no reason Niemi should be starting other than in one of their 17 back-to-back games.”


Twenty-five games? Niemi barely lasted 25 minutes as Murray’s back-up.

The Penguins put him in difficult situations for a back-up goalie to succeed and he responded by not succeeding at all.

In his first start, in the second game of the season, he gave up four goals in less than 10 minutes in a 10-1 loss to Chicago. In his next two starts, he was torched for 12 goals in two lopsided losses to Tampa Bay.

He was on waivers before the end of October, getting claimed by Florida, then traded to Montreal.

His final awful line with the Penguins: 3 games, 128 minutes played, 16 goals allowed, a .797 save percentage.

Once with the Canadiens, Niemi shockingly showed he wasn’t finished after all. He went 7-5-4 with a .929 save percentage and re-signed for another year as Carey Price’s back-up in May.


There’s a temptation to conclude that the prediction was terrible – perhaps the worst of the whole series, in hindsight – because Niemi stunk, and leave it at that.

Niemi’s performance with Montreal, however, shows there was more going on than that. He was simply put in a position with the Penguins where he had no choice but to fail.

His three starts were on the tail end of back-to-backs, on the road, against high-octane offenses, with a team in front of him that, coming off back-to-back champion runs, wasn’t ready to give the defensive effort required to win an NHL game.

Dallas’ leaky defense from the previous season looked like the 1974 Steel Curtain compared to the October Penguins. Niemi couldn’t stop the onslaught. It’s fair to wonder whether any goalie could have.

If Niemi had sprained his ankle getting off the bus on that night in Chicago and didn’t make his Penguins debut until December or January, this story might be completely different. Instead, it stands as an embarrassingly bad prediction.

In retrospect, Niemi’s greatest contribution to the Penguins was making sure an impressionable youngster like Tristan Jarry or Casey DeSmith didn’t have to take those three early season bullets. It might have broken their spirits.


It’s very difficult to hack into the Trib’s servers to try to erase a year-old story. Once something is on the internet, it’s on the internet forever.

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.