ShareThis Page
Penguins’ Casey DeSmith, not Matt Murray, gets nod in net against Canucks |

Penguins’ Casey DeSmith, not Matt Murray, gets nod in net against Canucks

| Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:48 a.m
Penguins goaltender Casey DeSmith is pressured by the Canadiens’ Artturi Lehkonen as Olli Maatta defends during the first period Saturday, Oct. 13, 2018 in Montreal.

Coach Mike Sullivan considers Casey DeSmith the hot hand in net, so he’ll start over Matt Murray when the Pittsburgh Penguins play host to the Vancouver Canucks on Tuesday night.

Murray hasn’t played since Oct. 6 due to a concussion, though he has been cleared to return to the lineup since Saturday.

DeSmith has gone 1-0-1 in Murray’s absence, stopping 35 shots in a 4-2 win over Vegas last Thursday and 37 shots in a 4-3 shootout loss at Montreal on Saturday night.

“When you look at his last couple of games, he’s really helped us get three out of four points,” Sullivan said. “He’s got a .935 save percentage in two games. It’s pretty impressive.”

Murray’s save percentage was .831 in his two starts before the injury.

“It doesn’t take away from the fact that Matt’s our No. 1 goalie,” Sullivan said. “He’s also coming off an injury. We felt as though it was the right decision at this particular time. It gives Matt another couple of days to get some practice time and get some rest. But certainly Casey’s performance in the last couple of games has been exceptional.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.