Even-strength offense dries up for Penguins during recent skid |

Even-strength offense dries up for Penguins during recent skid

Jonathan Bombulie
Pittsburgh Penguins’ Dominik Simon (12) can’t get off a shot as Toronto Maple Leafs goaltender Frederik Andersen (31) sprawls in the goal crease during the third period of an NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Saturday, Nov. 3, 2018. The Maple Leafs won 5-0.

After suffering through a 3-2 shootout loss to the New York Islanders on Thursday and a 5-0 blowout at the hands of the Toronto Maple Leafs on Saturday, the Pittsburgh Penguins could have easily pointed a finger at their power play.

Against the Islanders, a shorthanded goal by Josh Bailey in the second period was a pivotal point in the game.

Against the Maple Leafs, the Penguins went 0 for 5 with the man-advantage.

They could have scored the game’s first goal after Patrick Marleau was called for hooking less than five minutes in. They could have cut into a 2-0 deficit after Igor Ozhiganov and Nazem Kadri were whistled for consecutive minors 2 minutes, 1 second apart in the second period.

They did neither.

Defenseman Kris Letang, however, thinks such a blame game would be misguided.

“We had chances. Goalie was strong,” Letang said, tipping his cap to Frederik Andersen. “At the end of the day, you can’t rely just on your power play.

“We have to be able to make a difference five-on-five, try to find a way to score goals. It can’t be all tic-tac-toes or pretty plays. In a game like this, when it’s tight, you have to figure out a different way to produce.”

Letang probably has a point.

When the Penguins don’t score on the power play this season, they have a respectable 2-3-1 record. They can survive that.

When they don’t manage an even-strength goal, they’re 0-1-1.

Guess which two games those were.

Thursday’s loss to the Islanders and Saturday’s loss to the Maple Leafs.

“We didn’t get the quality chances we usually get on the rush,” Letang said. “They were always back. They were tracking back hard. It was one of those games. I didn’t think we found a way to make a difference when things don’t go your way.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.