Archive

Penguins trade Daniel Sprong to Anaheim for defenseman | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins trade Daniel Sprong to Anaheim for defenseman

Jonathan Bombulie
504820gtrpens07RA092718
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Daniel Sprong skates the puck up ice against the Sabres in the first period Wednesday, Sept. 26, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

Unable to elbow his way into the Pittsburgh Penguins lineup, winger Daniel Sprong was traded to the Anaheim Ducks for defenseman Marcus Pettersson on Monday.

Sprong, 21, established himself as the organization’s top goal-scoring prospect with a goal-per-game season in juniors two years ago and a point-per-game season in Wilkes-Barre/Scranton of the AHL last season.

Amidst concerns from the coaching staff about his play away from the puck, he never found his way into the NHL lineup on a regular basis. He had no goals and four assists in 16 games with the Penguins this season.

Pettersson, 22, is considered an up-and-coming young defenseman. He has been among Anaheim’s top six defensemen most of this season, recording no goals, six assists and a plus-4 rating in 27 games.

A second-round pick in the 2014 draft, Pettersson has a 6-foot-3 frame and a left-handed shot.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.