ShareThis Page
Penguins lineup split along party lines |

Penguins lineup split along party lines

| Wednesday, December 12, 2018 2:27 p.m
Pittsburgh Penguins’ Brian Dumoulin (8), Zach Aston-Reese (46) and Phil Kessel (81) celebrate after Aston-Reese scored against Winnipeg Jets goaltender Connor Hellebuyck (37) during the third period of an NHL hockey game, Tuesday, Nov. 27, 2018, in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

CHICAGO – Thanks to injuries to scoring-line forwards Patric Hornqvist and Dominik Simon, the Pittsburgh Penguins can draw a clear distinction between their top six and bottom six forwards.

Scoring-line forwards are in the top six and checking-line forwards are in the bottom six heading into a matchup with the Chicago Blackhawks on Wednesday night.

It reminds winger Zach Aston-Reese of American politics.


“At the end of the day, it’s the same goal: Put the puck in the net and win the hockey game,” Aston-Reese explained. “It might be like Republicans and Democrats, though. You want the same goal, but the way of doing it is a little different.”

The Penguins are hoping the two groups can co-exist a little more peacefully than Republicans and Democrats in Congress do these days.

In most cases, coach Mike Sullivan likes to spread out his scoring options among his top three lines. Hornqvist and Simon being out prompted a change in that philosophy.

In Tuesday’s practice, Sidney Crosby centered Jake Guentzel and Derick Brassard on the top line and Evgeni Malkin skated between Tanner Pearson and Phil Kessel on the second line. They’ve combined to score 56 goals this season.

The third line had Riley Sheahan centering Aston-Reese and Bryan Rust while Derek Grant, Matt Cullen, Jean-Sebastien Dea and Garrett Wilson rotated into the fourth line. They’ve combined for seven goals this season.

“We’ve talked about it for a few games now,” Sullivan said. “Are we better served with moving the offensive people together and seeing if we can get results that way and creating more energy line and checking lines and things of that capacity in the bottom two?”

For now, the answer is yes, which creates some subtle changes in the way players like Aston-Reese approach the game.

Sheahan and Rust create offense differently than, say, Brassard and Kessel do.

“When you play with more skilled guys, you have a little more pressure to make plays on yourself,” Aston-Reese said. “When you play with like Riley or Rusty or when I was playing with Cully, you could chip pucks into space and kind of create more battle situations than more fancy plays, I guess you could say.”

There’s some merit, Aston-Reese said, to the idea of the bottom six playing in the offensive zone, creating energy and wearing down the opposition so that the top six can then step on the ice and do what they do best.

“I think back to when I first got called up,” Aston-Reese said. “My first couple games here I was playing with (Ryan Reaves) and that’s one of the things he said to me on the bench. Like, ‘Reeser, let’s just set the next line up. We’re probably not going to score, but just set the next line up.’ That’s one of the things that just sticks with you. It’s been with me since then.”

Aston-Reese, for the record, said he considers himself an independent capable of working with either party depending on the circumstances.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.