Don’t let Alex D’Orio’s recent record fool you — he’s a Penguins goalie prospect |

Don’t let Alex D’Orio’s recent record fool you — he’s a Penguins goalie prospect

Chris Adamski

Last September, Alex D’Orio must have felt on top of the hockey world.

Not long after turning 18, he capped a strong season for the Saint John Sea Dogs by leading them to the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League title. Soon after, he played in the prestigious Memorial Cup tournament, earned an invite to Penguins development camp on a tryout and stood out enough there and for the Penguins entry at the Prospects Challenge tournament that he earned a three-year contract with the organization.

This past season, though, was not nearly as memorable for D’Orio. Saint John’s roster entered a youth movement, and statistics that looked so pretty for D’Orio in 2016-17 (a 19-2-1 record, 2.40 goals-against average) turned rather ugly (9-26-2 record, 4.01 GAA) in 2017-18.

Through it all, D’Orio took it in stride, and so have the Penguins.

“For sure, last year we were a rebuilding team, so it was (expected) because guys were younger and a lot of guys were in their first year in juniors so it was much more difficult to get wins,” D’Orio said. “But this year our team is going to be older and more mature, so I think it’s going to be a good year for us.”

With the trade of highly touted prospect Filip Gustavsson in late February, the Penguins’ organizational depth chart at goalie is much thinner . Still only 19 and a long way from reaching the NHL, D’Orio remains a possible part of the organization’s future.

The 6-foot-2, 209-pound D’Orio will play his final season in juniors this winter.

“I’ve learned so much about being a pro on and off the ice (at Penguins development camp this week). Now I want my last year at juniors to be fun,” D’Orio said. “Improve as much as I can and have fun.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.