ShareThis Page
Ex-Penguins defenseman Niskanen still miffed by coaches’ firings |

Ex-Penguins defenseman Niskanen still miffed by coaches’ firings

Washington Capitals defenseman Matt Niskanen remains miffed at how the Penguins handled last offseason’s coaching changes, and he made no secret of it.

“The organization can say whatever it wants, that it wasn’t sure what it wanted to do, all that stuff,” he said. “But it was (bull).

“It’s not like Dan (Bylsma) was a chump or something, but that’s how he was treated. He won you guys a Cup, you know?”

Niskanen left the Penguins via free agency last summer and gets his first up-close look at his old team Saturday at Consol Energy Center.

Niskanen took offense at how the Penguins treated Bylsma and assistants Tony Granato and Todd Reirden.

The Penguins fired general manager Ray Shero on May 16. Many expected them to fire Bylsma and his staff at the same time.

Instead, the Penguins retained Bylsma, Granato and Reirden until June 6. On that day, the Penguins hired Jim Rutherford to replace Shero.

Rutherford announced the firings of the coaches that afternoon. Bylsma remains out of work, though the Penguins are paying him about $4 million over the next two years, while Granato (Detroit) and Reirden (Washington) landed assistant coaching positions.

Niskanen said numerous Penguins players were angry by the way the coaches were treated. The coaches, Niskanen said, should have been retained or fired immediately so that they could have pursued work rather than be in a holding pattern.

Niskanen was joined by Reirden and former Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik in Washington. Orpik and Niskanen signed long-term contracts.

“The Penguins always treated me and my family in a first-class way,” Reirden said. “That said, it was a difficult time this summer with all the uncertainty. You put a lot of time and effort into helping players improve and, ultimately, trying to help the organization win another Stanley Cup. Unfortunately we weren’t able to do that. Hard feelings? No. I’m just thankful for the opportunity but at the same time disappointed in the decision they made.”

Orpik, among the most outspoken Penguins during his time in Pittsburgh, chose his words carefully.

“I definitely have an opinion on it,” Orpik said. “But I don’t think it does any good to share that right now. At the end of the day, it’s people running a business. That’s what you always hear. It’s a cut-throat business. I don’t think anything surprises me anymore.”

Niskanen and Orpik insisted they have no hard feelings and that, on personal levels, were treated well.

“I was always treated really well when I was there,” Niskanen said. “But, you know, I have a real problem with how those guys were treated. A lot of guys on the team were very upset by how everything happened.”

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.