Archive

Following Sidney Crosby’s lead, Golden Knights don’t fear conference trophy | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Following Sidney Crosby’s lead, Golden Knights don’t fear conference trophy

Jonathan Bombulie
KnightsJetsHockey19040jpg2dbb4
Vegas Golden Knights' James Neal (18), Deryk Engelland (5), goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury (29) and the rest of the team celebrate after defeating the Winnipeg Jets during NHL Western Conference Finals, game 5, in Winnipeg, Sunday, May 20, 2018. (Trevor Hagan/The Canadian Press via AP)
ptrpens37052716
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly (left) and Penguins Chris Kunitz (second to left), Sidney Crosby (second to right) and Evgeni Malkin pose with the Prince of Wales trophy. 'A heck of an accomplishment,' Kunitz said.

Penguins captain Sidney Crosby is one of the most superstitious athletes around.

It’s ironic, then, that his actions may have put an end to one of the NHL’s most intriguing superstitions of the last two decades.

Seconds after the clock struck zero and the Vegas Golden Knights defeated the Winnipeg Jets 2-1 Sunday to close out the Western Conference finals in five games, acting captain Deryk Engelland had a conversation with goalie Marc-Andre Fleury just before the teams engaged in the ceremonial postgame handshake.

They were discussing whether Engelland should touch the Clarence Campbell Bowl that NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly was about to present to him and his teammates.

In a superstition started by Philadelphia Flyers captain Eric Lindros in 1997, teams winning an NHL conference championship often do not celebrate with the trophy out of fear that such an action will prevent them from winning the award they really wanted to win in the next round.

In the West, the conference champ hadn’t touched the trophy since the 2004 Calgary Flames. Overall, neither conference champ touched the trophy in a five-year stretch from 2011 to 2015.

Engelland decided to touch the trophy.

“We decided as a group to take it because we went through the experience together,” Engelland told reporters afterward. “(Fleury) has been the backbone to our team, so more or less it came down to what he wanted to do.”

It’s not hard to see why Fleury wanted to touch the trophy.

In 2008, Crosby and his teammates followed the superstitious tradition and did not touch the Prince of Wales Trophy after beating the Flyers in the conference finals. They lost to the Detroit Red Wings in the Stanley Cup Final in six games.

The following season, Crosby handled the trophy after beating Carolina to win the conference title. The Penguins won the Cup in seven games.

Over the past two seasons, the Penguins touched the conference championship trophy while their final opponents did not. That didn’t work out too well for the San Jose Sharks or Nashville Predators.

Given those results, it looks like the tradition of not touching the conference championship trophy is on thin ice.

For the record, historically speaking, the correct play is to touch the trophy.

According to a study done by the blog ontheforecheck.com, teams that touch the conference championship trophy since 1997 are 10-7 in the Stanley Cup Final. Teams that don’t touch the trophy are 10-13.

In years where one team touches the conference championship trophy and the other does not, the touchers are 6-3 in the Final.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.