Mumps confirmed for Penguins’ Bennett; team intern also affected |

Mumps confirmed for Penguins’ Bennett; team intern also affected

Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
The Penguins' Beau Bennett plays against the Islanders, Nov. 21, 2014, at Consol Energy Center.

Beau Bennett officially was diagnosed with mumps Monday. He’s not alone, Trib Total Media has learned.

A Penguins intern who gathers sound in locker rooms also was diagnosed Monday with mumps.

Bennett is the 14th NHL player with a confirmed case of and the second on the Penguins, joining captain Sidney Crosby.

Bennett was at Children’s Hospital last Thursday, along with every Penguins player except Crosby, but the hospital said Monday that Bennett was not near any kids in an immune suppressed state.

The intern, who was granted anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the topic, told the Trib he awoke Monday with a dry mouth, a headache, swelling around his jaw and an irritation in his ears.

He’s in isolation through Saturday. The intern was around the Penguins last Tuesday at Southpointe, last Thursday at Consol Energy Center and Sunday at Consol for the news conference announcing Crosby’s case.

The intern also spent time in the Rangers and Devils locker rooms and around Tanner Glass and Corey Perry — NHL teams and players linked to the recent mumps outbreak.

Blood was not drawn, but the diagnosing doctor provided this statement: “You do not need confirmatory testing for mumps to have this reported. Presumed/probable mumps based on clinical suspicion and contact history is enough.”

The intern said he received MMR and booster shots.

Jason Mackey is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @Mackey_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.