NHL will not discipline Sharks’ Marleau for hit to Rust’s head |

NHL will not discipline Sharks’ Marleau for hit to Rust’s head

Jonathan Bombulie

Having scored four goals in the last three games — the three biggest games the Penguins have played in years — Bryan Rust has emerged as a cult hero and his team's chief offensive spark.

Now the Penguins might have to get by without him.

Coach Mike Sullivan said Tuesday there was no update on Rust's condition after he took a check to the head from San Jose's Patrick Marleau in the third period of Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Final the night before. Rust, who skated on his own after the Penguins held an optional practice in Cranberry, is day-to-day with an upper-body injury, Sullivan said.

The NHL's Department of Player Safety elected not to suspend Marleau, who received a two-minute minor for illegal checking to the head.

“Main points of contact: shoulders, chest. Rust low, off-balance, reaching,” Player Safety tweeted from its account. “Marleau does not ‘pick' the head, elevate or extend. Head contact is with Marleau's back.”

Sidney Crosby said the Penguins locker room wasn't “up in arms” about the lack of a suspension.

“It was a pretty fast play,” Crosby said. “(Marleau is) not known for doing stuff across the line out there.”

Sullivan did not comment on the decision.

“I shared my opinion on that last night,” Sullivan said, referring to his postgame remarks in which he called the play a blind-side hit to the head. “We're just going to play hockey. The league does their job. We're going to do our job. We're just going to play.”

If Rust is out, replacing his speed won't be easy. He's one of the team's most disruptive forces on the forecheck.

“He's been great for us,” Crosby said. “He's provided scoring, speed. He's been strong on pucks. If he's not in, we'll have to make sure everyone steps up.”

Rust's spot on a line with Evgeni Malkin and Chris Kunitz could be filled by Matt Cullen or Eric Fehr.

Cullen skated in that spot late in the third period Monday.

“Matt's a versatile guy,” Sullivan said. “We've used him up and down the lineup all year.”

Fehr skated there at times in the Washington Capitals series.

“He has a real good awareness in the ‘D' zone,” Sullivan said. “He's pretty strong on the wall. He brings all of those elements to the line we choose to put him on.”

The promotion of Cullen or Fehr would open a spot on the fourth line, which likely would be filled by Beau Bennett or Oskar Sundqvist.

In his return from a shoulder injury, Bennett played 11 uneventful minutes in Game 5 against Tampa Bay in the Eastern Conference finals.

He would be the more offensive option.

“If I'm slotted in there, I've got to be able to make a contribution right away,” Bennett said. “I think I was maybe playing a little too cautious my first time around there.”

Sundqvist played one game in the first-round series against the New York Rangers and one game in the Capitals series. He would be the more defensive option

“I'm pretty comfortable when we don't have the puck,” Sundqvist said. “I'm usually a guy that's on the right side. I think Sully knows that, too.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

Getty Images
The Penguins' Bryan Rust looks to pass the puck during a game against Rangers on Feb. 10, 2016, at Consol Energy Center.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.