ShareThis Page
Nick Bonino’s status with Penguins questionable for Game 3 |

Nick Bonino’s status with Penguins questionable for Game 3

Bill West
| Friday, June 2, 2017 12:51 p.m
Christian Tyler Randolph | Tribune-Review
Penguins center Nick Bonino (13) is helped into the bench area against the Predators in the first period during Game 2 of the Stanley Cup Final on Wednesday, May 31, 2017, at PPG Paints Arena.
Christian Tyler Randolph | Tribune-Review
Penguins center Nick Bonino (13) kneels on the ice after being hit in the ankle with a puck against the Predators in the first period of Game 2 of the Stanley Cup Final on Wednesday, May 31, 2017, at PPG Paints Arena.

A 101-degree fever and almost daily antibiotic and IV treatment for an elbow infection failed to keep Nick Bonino out of the 2016 Stanley Cup Final. He sat out of almost every practice during the final round but found a way to dress for all six games against San Jose.

Another rest-heavy routine in the Stanley Cup Final for Bonino might have begun Friday, when the third-line center missed a full-team practice at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex in Cranberry with a lower-body injury, one likely caused by the P.K. Subban slap shot he blocked during Game 2 on Wednesday.

Coach Mike Sullivan described Bonino as “day-to-day” and did not rule him out for Saturday’s Game 3 against the Nashville Predators.

Bonino arrived in Nashville wearing a walking boot on his left foot and using crutches.

Though he needed help from teammates to get back to the bench after using his left ankle to deny Subban’s short during a penalty kill in the middle of the first period, Bonino joined the Penguins for the start of the second period and finished with 16 minutes and six seconds of ice time.

Sullivan praised Bonino earlier in the series for his ability to adapt to different linemates and all manner of situations.

Friday’s practice indicated the Penguins will turn to another jack-of-all-trades, Carter Rowney, if in need of a center for Game 3.

“At this point, I just answer as a forward,” said Rowney, who served as a center with Wilkes-Barre/Scranton but has primarily flanked Matt Cullen or Bonino since reaching the NHL. “I kind of get thrown around. It seems like every other shift I’ll be a center or a wing. It kind of changes, and that’s something I take pride in, my ability to be versatile and to be put in different situations, different positions who goes out there to do the job.”

Rowney also possesses some familiarity with the penalty kill, so he could receive more short-handed minutes to offset a potential absence of Bonino, whose 2:26 of short-handed ice time per game in the playoffs leads Penguins forwards.

But if Rowney moves to center, a slot in the lineup would open for Carl Hagelin or Tom Kuhnhackl, both of whom have penalty-killing experience.

Jake Guentzel, meanwhile, moved into a center role at Friday’s practice as the Penguins worked on their second power-play unit. The winger, who served as a center for years before he turned pro, rehearsed faceoff plays under the watchful eye of Sullivan. But Guentzel, even in the midst of a dominant rookie playoff run, doubts he will start directing teammates where to go off draws as Sidney Crosby often does.

“I don’t think I can do that just yet,” Guentzel said. “It’s different taking draws. It gets you a little more in the game. It’s definitely fun for sure.”

One area where there’s no obvious replacement in waiting is the dressing room.

One of the Penguins’ more gregarious skaters, Bonino forged bonds with rookies and veterans alike.

“He’s one of those kind of middle guys,” said Conor Sheary, whose stall neighbors Bonino’s. “He’s not an older guy. He’s not a younger guy. He’s just one of those guys that mixes with everyone.”

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.