Penguins defense must bounce back in pivotal Game 6 |

Penguins defense must bounce back in pivotal Game 6

Jonathan Bombulie

By blowing a third-period lead and losing Game 5 of the Metropolitan Division finals Saturday night, the Penguins backed themselves into the tightest of corners.

They will need to clean up their mistakes, return to a championship level of consistency and win Game 6 at PPG Paints Arena on Monday night, or they will see their hopes of a three-peat go up in smoke.

This is a corner with which defenseman Olli Maatta is familiar.

Maatta made a costly blunder in Game 3 of the series, committing an offensive-zone turnover in the final two minutes that led to Alex Ovechkin's winning goal on a two-on-one break. It put the Penguins in a 2-1 hole and could have turned the series in Washington's favor for good.

It was the only time Maatta has been on the ice for a five-on-five goal against so far in the playoffs.

He was out for none against the Flyers and none in the other four games against the Capitals.

“Pretty tough one though, right?” Maatta said.

Maatta and the Penguins responded to the gaffe with their most stout defensive effort of the playoffs, locking down a 3-1 win in Game 4.

One of the keys to bouncing back, Maatta said, was having a short memory. By the time the puck dropped to start the next game, he was no longer thinking about making a mistake.

“You go and play,” Maatta said. “You see a play and you make it. It's a matter of hundredths of seconds. That's what it is. You've got to trust yourself and play to your instincts. You've done those things for your whole life. It comes naturally.”

Fast forward a few days, and a few of Maatta's teammates are in a similar position.

Top-pair defenders Kris Letang and Brian Dumoulin were victimized for two critical goals in Saturday night's 6-3 Penguins loss. Goalie Matt Murray didn't like how he played some of Washington's better chances. Dominik Simon took a costly penalty in the first period. The list is long.

Beyond having a short memory, Maatta has a few theories about how the Penguins can tighten up their game for a pivotal Game 6.

For one, talk.

A supremely skilled Washington roster isn't going to create scoring chances in a predictable way. When the Capitals zig instead of zag, communication becomes paramount.

“I think it's just being on the same page,” Maatta said. “I think everybody's got to know and trust each other and know where they are. I think that's a big thing. Talking is a big thing, being able to talk to your partner, talk to your teammate and help him out.”

For another, battle.

The fancy passing plays and lethal breakaway finishes make the highlight reels, but the Capitals created some of their best scoring chances of Game 5 by winning puck battles on the walls to set up teammates streaking to the net.

“You've got to win them,” Maatta said. “You want to do everything you can in your role to win them. Those are huge. They dictate the game, really, who's going to play with the puck and who's going to defend. That's huge in this series.”

Improving their communication skills and upping their battle level won't prevent the Penguins from making mistakes in Game 6, of course, but it could give them a chance to overcome them and extend their season for at least two more days.

“It's a game of mistakes out there. I've yet to go through a game where somebody doesn't make one,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “We're not going to dwell on anything. We're just going to learn from it and make sure we use it to become better as a group and as individuals. I think that's how our players look at it.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.