ShareThis Page
Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin won’t be suspended for hit to Washington’s T.J. Oshie |

Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin won’t be suspended for hit to Washington’s T.J. Oshie

| Thursday, November 8, 2018 11:06 a.m
Pittsburgh Penguins center Evgeni Malkin, left, of Russia, gestures as he leaves the ice after he was given a match penalty during the third period of an NHL hockey game against the Washington Capitals, Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Washington. The Capitals won 2-1.

Evgeni Malkin will not be suspended for his hit on Washington Capitals winger T.J. Oshie during a 2-1 Pittsburgh Penguins loss on Wednesday night.

Malkin was assessed a match penalty for delivering a shoulder to Oshie’s chin. Match penalties are automatically reviewed by the league.

In order for a player to be disciplined for such a hit, two conditions must be met. The main point of contact must be the head and the contact must be deemed avoidable.

There’s no question the main point of contact was Oshie’s head. He had to go to the locker room for concussion testing before returning to the ice and scoring the winning goal in the game’s final 90 seconds.

The avoidability of the hit is the gray area in this case. Malkin did not initiate contact or change his path to deliver a hit. Oshie skated into Malkin’s body as he attempted to get past the Penguins center. Oshie suggested after the game that Malkin may have thought he was about to be hit and therefore braced himself for contact.

Malkin hasn’t been suspended in his 13-year NHL career. A $5,000 fine for spearing Los Angeles’ Dustin Brown during a game last season is the only supplemental discipline he has faced.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.