ShareThis Page
Penguins’ franchise value stays flat at $650 million, Forbes reports |

Penguins’ franchise value stays flat at $650 million, Forbes reports

The Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:51 p.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
A young Penguins fans cheers them on against the Capitals in the second period Thursday, Oct. 4, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

The Penguins rank 11th in the NHL with a value of $650 million, according to the annual survey of franchise values released Wednesday by Forbes Magazine.

That number is unchanged from a year ago and up $170 million compared to five years ago.

Last season, the Penguins were the league’s 10th most valuable franchise. They were jumped by the Washington Capitals, who saw their worth increase $100 million to $725 million after winning the Stanley Cup and signing a new television deal in the past year.

Future television revenues are likely to pump up franchise values moving forward, Forbes reported. The league’s 10-year, $2 billion deal with NBC runs out after the 2020-21 season, and analysts expect the next national TV contract to nearly double in value.

A potential work stoppage in 2020 or 2022, of course, could derail that increase.

Four NHL teams have a value greater than $1 billion – the New York Rangers, Toronto Maple Leafs, Montreal Canadiens and Chicago Blackhawks. The Arizona Coyotes and Florida Panthers are the least valuable franchises, with price tags under $300 million.

Forbes also released a list of the league’s highest-earning players. Sidney Crosby is fifth at $13.8 million annually, behind Connor McDavid (19.5), John Tavares (17.3), Carey Price (15.6) and Alex Ovechkin (14.5).

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.