Penguins general manager Shero: I’m not trading Staal |

Penguins general manager Shero: I’m not trading Staal

Penguins center Jordan Staal plays against the Avalanche at Consol Energy Center Nov. 15, 2011. (Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review)
The Penguins' Jordan Staal celebrates his first period goal in front of Devils defenseman Matt Taormina at Consol Energy Center March 25, 2012. Chaz Palla | Tribune Review
The Penguins' Jordan Staal carries the puck against the Blue Jackets at Consol Energy Center Feb 26, 2012. (Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review)
Chaz Palla/For The Valley Independent
Penguins General Manager Ray Shero is one of three indviduals up for GM of the Year in the NHL.

The numbers suggest keeping Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin and Jordan Staal together through their prime years will be almost impossible.

General Manager Ray Shero said something entirely different Tuesday.

Shero told the Tribune-Review that he isn’t interested in trading Staal, who can become a free agent next summer. Speculation has swirled since April when Staal was asked how the three could remain happy with the Penguins and he responded, “That’s a good question.”

Shero painted a different picture.

“He told me he likes it here,” Shero said. “Told me he likes Pittsburgh, likes being a Penguin.”

Staal was Shero’s first draft pick in 2006.

There are two questions pertaining to Staal: Will he be satisfied being the third-line center for the duration of his career? And, can the Penguins reasonably sign him — along with Crosby and Malkin — next year while remaining under the salary cap?

The long-term salary cap figures are unknown because of impending CBA negotiations.

Shero didn’t get into specifics but made his intentions clear. Teams are inquiring daily about Staal, Shero said, but he remains uninterested in any offer.

“People read the newspapers and so maybe they think he’s available,” Shero said. “That stuff is all speculation. I have made it clear to every team that has asked. I don’t want to trade Jordan. I’m not listening to offers. I want Jordan here. I want him here for a long time, and that’s what I’m going to try to do.”

There is still the possibility Staal could be available at some point this summer. Shero’s on-the-record desire to sign him could also be a tactic used to increase possible trade value.

Shero and Staal’s agent, Paul Krepelka, have spoken recently. No deal can be signed before July 1, but Shero said it is within NHL rules to discuss generalities of a new contract.

Krepelka was contacted by the Tribune-Review on Tuesday evening but declined comment on Shero’s desire to sign Staal.

Shero passionately maintains that he is completely invested in signing Staal, who is getting married Friday.

Attempting to orchestrate a trade while simultaneously working out a contract for Staal would be disingenuous, according to Shero.

“You can’t have it both ways,” Shero said. “I can’t try to negotiate a contract with Jordan and a trade with another team at the same time. It doesn’t work that way. We don’t want to trade Jordan. We think we can sign him.”

Shero touched on a couple of other topics.

He confirmed that he has spoken with agent Pat Brisson about Sidney Crosby’s contract. The two would like to work out a deal this summer, though so far, talks have only been “general.”

“I sure hope it gets done quickly,” said Shero, who noted that Crosby’s ability to make it through the final month of the regular season and playoffs unscathed was comforting to the team and its captain.

Shero also said that he will not engage in contract talks with free agents Steve Sullivan and Arron Asham until after the NHL Entry Draft, which is this weekend in Pittsburgh.

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at [email protected] or 412-664-9161, Ext. 1975.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.