ShareThis Page
Penguins GM Jim Rutherford seeing faint signs of improvement |

Penguins GM Jim Rutherford seeing faint signs of improvement

Michael Liedtke
| Monday, December 3, 2018 7:27 p.m
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
General manager Jim Rutherford has loaded up on centers this offseason.

Pittsburgh Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford is cautiously optimistic about the way his team is trending.

The caution is intense. The optimism is mild. But it probably ticks off enough boxes to be considered cautiously optimistic all the same.

“There are the signs that this team is starting to get to where we all feel it should be and is capable of being,” Rutherford said. “Now we have to get some breaks, we have to get some consistency in the team, and the key to that is we have to get some consistent goaltending, which is the key to all teams, not just the Penguins.

“Once that happens, then this team will get to the level where it should be.”

When Rutherford made his first trade of the season, sending Carl Hagelin to Los Angeles for Tanner Pearson last month, his team had lost six of its last seven games. Optimism was at an all-time low.

The improvement since then has been painstakingly slow and has come in fits and starts. There was a five-game points streak followed by deflating losses to Colorado and Philadelphia. Add it all up, and they’re 10-10-5.

“When you’re fighting for your confidence and you’re fighting for wins, it seems like once a week, there’s one or two players in a game that end up having off nights and it ends up costing us the game,” Rutherford said.

Rutherford is confident his goalies – Casey DeSmith and Tristan Jarry for now, Matt Murray once he returns from his lower-body injury – will be able to eliminate their off nights.

“Certainly, the goalies we have all have the ability,” Rutherford said.

When it comes to another potential trouble spot on the roster – production from the third line, especially its center, Derick Brassard – Rutherford went heavier on the caution and lighter on the optimism.

Brassard has one goal and no assists in eight games since returning from a lower-body injury last month.

“He had a good camp. He played pretty well up until he got hurt,” Rutherford said. “Since he’s come off the injury, whether he’s being cautious with the injury or whatever it is, he hasn’t had that same drive to be the guy we need him to be. So, yes, he can be (the answer at third-line center), but he needs to be better than he has been since he’s come off his injury.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.