ShareThis Page
Penguins Insider: Crosby finds his power-play muse |

Penguins Insider: Crosby finds his power-play muse

| Wednesday, April 20, 2016 7:27 p.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Sidney Crosby celebrates his power-play goal against the Rangers in the second period of Game 3 of their Eastern Conference first-round series Tuesday, April 19, 2016, in New York.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Sidney Crosby skates with the puck away from the Rangers' Dominic Moore in the third period of Game 3 of their Eastern Conference first-round series Tuesday, April 19, 2016, in New York.

NEW YORK — Center Sidney Crosby discovered his power-play muse while he sat on the bench in the first two games of the Penguins’ first-round Stanley Cup playoff series with the New York Rangers and watched Carl Hagelin, Matt Cullen, Tom Kuhnhackl, Ian Cole and the rest of the team’s penalty killers turn man disadvantages into short-handed scoring chances.

“You watch our own guys go over the boards and the way that they’re off after 30 seconds and they’re moving their feet and they’re killing hard,” Crosby said. “As a power play (unit), you have to know that you have to have that same mindset going over. Once you can kind of settle things down, and once you get the puck retrieved, then you can kind of make your plays after that. But first and foremost, you’re just worried about making sure that you get control.”

For the Penguins, transferring their superior possession abilities in five-on-five play to power-play performances remains a work in progress. Through Game 3, they generated just 70.59 percent of the shots on goal during their five-on-four power plays, the lowest share among the 16 playoff teams, according to Only their shooting percentage (25.0) kept them among the most productive power-play teams in the postseason in terms of goal scoring.

By comparison, the Penguins’ penalty kill is the only one since the start of the playoffs to score short-handed and not allow a goal. The unit also has accounted for 23.1 percent of the shots during Rangers’ power plays, a share that ranks third in the playoffs.

But Crosby and company like where their half of the special teams effort is headed. They already provide some of the prettiest goals — Crosby’s tap-in after Phil Kessel threaded a pass in Game 3 and Kessel’s goal on a no-look backhanded dish from Nick Bonino in Game 2 rank as series highlights. They expect their power-play efforts also will soon provide confidence-building offensive zone time rather than maddening neutral-zone regroups and costly giveaways, such as the one in Game 3 that set up Rick Nash’s breakaway.

“I think the last couple games, we’ve probably done a better job holding it in there (in the offensive end,” Crosby said. “(On Tuesday), we did a good job of just making a couple passes and executing.

“But you’ve got to make sure you outwork the other team, and usually that other stuff just kind of takes care of itself.”

When general manager Jim Rutherford fired Mike Johnston on Dec. 12 and introduced Mike Sullivan as Penguins coach, he harped on the importance of a shot-oriented power play, one that resisted the urge to pass around the periphery in search of the perfect scoring chance.

Ebbs and flows in the Penguins’ performances with a man advantage followed over the next several months, notably when Evgeni Malkin left the lineup with injuries. But the Penguins never struggled with shot generation on the power play, only in putting the puck in the back of the net.

After the Rangers held the Penguins to five shots on goal on five power-play opportunities in Game 1, not even Patric Hornqvist’s power-play goal eased the frustration over execution in that area of special teams. Sullivan said the Penguins needed to improve their offensive zone entries.

Improvements became apparent to the coach by the end of Game 3.

“I think our entries have been pretty good,” Sullivan said. “The Rangers are a high-pressure kill. They put a lot of pressure on our guys to have to make plays, and I think our guys have done a pretty good job as far as supporting the puck and trying to keep the puck. And when the opportunity presents itself to get it to the net, they’re trying to get it to the net.

“The power play over the last handful of games has scored some big goals for us. That one late in the second period (Tuesday, scored by Crosby) might’ve been the biggest goal scored for us in the series.”

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.