Penguins nemesis John Tortorella signs 2-year extension with Blue Jackets |

Penguins nemesis John Tortorella signs 2-year extension with Blue Jackets

Columbus Blue Jackets head coach John Tortorella stands behind his bench during the first period of an NHL hockey game against the Pittsburgh Penguins in Pittsburgh, Tuesday, April 4, 2017. The Penguins won 4-1. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

Longtime Pittsburgh Penguins nemesis John Tortorella locked in a deal that will keep the oft-agitated coach behind the Columbus Blue Jackets’ bench through 2021.

Never one to hold back, particularly when it comes to the Penguins, Tortorella signed a two-year contract extension to remain with Columbus through the 2020-21 season, keeping the coach within the Metropolitan Division.

As coach of the Rangers in 2012, Tortorella referred to the Penguins organization as “one of the most arrogant organizations in the league.”

Earlier this summer, after the Penguins signed Jack Johnson, Tortorella ripped into his former defenseman and his new franchise, after Johnson declared he was excited “to be part of a winning culture.”

“For (Johnson) to put it the way he put it today is (expletive),” Tortorella told The Athletic. “And to have a general manager question our decision making from three hours away, he must be (an expletive) magician.”

Johnson later tried to clear the air about his comments.

In case you needed a refresher, here’s Tortorella in 2015 talking about “whining” and the Penguins.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.