Penguins notebook: Bylsma sees similar scenario from 2009 |

Penguins notebook: Bylsma sees similar scenario from 2009

An underachieving but defensively sound Penguins team fires its coach during the season and promotes his replacement from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton. The new coach brings in a faster, more dynamic style of play and the team responds with a fantastic month of March.

That’s the script from 2009 when Dan Bylsma replaced Michel Therrien and led the Penguins to a 10-1-2 March on the way to a Stanley Cup championship.

That’s the script that is playing out this season, too, with Mike Sullivan replacing Mike Johnston midseason and guiding the Penguins to a 10-4 record in March heading into Tuesday night’s game with the Buffalo Sabres.

Don’t think Bylsma hasn’t noticed the similarities.

“I do. I do see a lot of similarities in how they’re playing and the way their team is playing,” Bylsma said. “Frankly, that’s a little bit scary. Should be scary for a lot of people.

“They’re playing with a ton of speed. They’re really testing teams with the length of which they play and the speed of which they play. Right now, you watch (Sidney Crosby) and (Kris Letang) play, pretty dominant performances they’re putting in on the ice.

“Kris Letang, the last few games, has just been a force on the ice with his speed, his puck control. You see that five-on-five. You see it on the power play as well. They’ve been a pretty dangerous team.”

The comparison between the 2009 and ’16 Penguins resonates down the hall in the home locker room at Consol Energy Center as well, with one caveat: The ending for this script hasn’t been written yet.

“I hope. I hope we’re talking about that a few months from now. That would be great,” Crosby said. “I think with the situation and the timing of everything and some young guys coming in and playing well at the right time and some of the trades, I think it’s kind of worked out very similar.

“But with that, if you look back to that year, we continued to get better and better. … That desperation level was there all the way through. We have to make sure we mimic that as best as we can.”

Bennett’s spot

Four games into his return to the lineup after missing 42 games with a shoulder injury, Beau Bennett found himself in a prominent position Tuesday.

He was on the team’s top power-play unit alongside Crosby, Letang, Patric Hornqvist and Justin Schultz.

“We’re trying to find different looks that work,” Bennett said. “Our power play hasn’t been great since (Evgeni Malkin was injured March 11), so whoever’s going to slot in there and make the right plays … hopefully, I can do that for the first power play.”

Phil Kessel and Nick Bonino, who have found offensive chemistry at even strength in recent games, anchored the second unit with Trevor Daley, Derrick Pouliot and Chris Kunitz.

The Penguins are 4 for 29 on the power play since Malkin went down with an upper-body injury March 11.

Splitting Crosby and Kessel will give the Penguins the opportunity to share power-play time more evenly between the units.

Infrequent start

Rookie Matt Murray got the start Tuesday, playing for the first time since March 17 and the third time since being called up from the minors Feb. 27.

“It’s been a different challenge,” Murray said. “I kind of went through it early last year in my rookie season in the American League. Definitely went through it in the Ontario League when I was younger. It’s not a new thing, but it’s never easy. I’ve tried to use practice as a way to stay sharp.”

Injury report

Defenseman Brian Dumoulin missed his second consecutive game after taking a hit to the head Saturday in Detroit. Sullivan offered no updates on his condition.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.