Archive

ShareThis Page
Penguins notebook: Crosby, Malkin defend prospect McDavid | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins notebook: Crosby, Malkin defend prospect McDavid

• The hockey world has been abuzz about super-prospect Connor McDavid, who broke a bone in his hand after engaging in a fight Tuesday in Erie. Penguins star centers Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin agreed it isn’t in McDavid’s best interest to fight, but they have the unique perspective of how far stars can be pushed. “You’re not thinking when you fight,” Malkin said. “You’re just mad. You’re excited. It’s all emotion. You’re not even thinking about breaking something. You’re just not thinking. He doesn’t fight a lot. It’s his first time. Maybe he didn’t understand what was going on. I hope he comes back soon.” Crosby has dropped the gloves a handful of times in his career, though he only engaged in a “half of one” in his junior career. “I was fortunate on our team to have guys who took good care of me,” Crosby said. McDavid, hockey’s most-hyped player since Crosby, is expected to miss five to six weeks with the injury. “I think it’s tough,” Crosby said. “You don’t necessarily want to see him fight. I know that’s not his job. I’m sure he’s got a target on his back. It’s not easy sometimes.”

• The Penguins arrived in Toronto almost an hour late for their practice because of a traffic jam in New York City but had a 60-minute workout at the Maple Leafs practice facility. Every player on the roster took part in practice.

• Toronto enters the game after beating up on Boston, 6-1, on Wednesday night. Right wing Phil Kessel scored twice against the Bruins and is on quite a roll. “I wish I had a shot like that,” Maple Leafs center Tyler Bozak said.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.