Penguins notebook: Ehrhoff returns from head injury |

Penguins notebook: Ehrhoff returns from head injury

WASHINGTON — Christian Ehrhoff said he never has experienced anything like this, and the implication is the Penguins defenseman hopes he never does again.

Ehrhoff returned Wednesday at Washington, ending a 12-game absence that was the result of his head hitting the Verizon Center ice twice after bouncing off Alex Ovechkin on Jan. 28.

“Throughout this process, it’s a frustrating injury,” Ehrhoff said. “You don’t know what the timetable is. You just go day by day. It’s not set in stone when you can come back. As a player, it’s a little more frustrating of an injury.”

Ehrhoff’s average ice time of 22:15 ranks third on the team. He averages 1:57 on the power play, which trails only Kris Letang among Penguins defensemen.

Without Ehrhoff, the Penguins almost exclusively played Robert Bortuzzo and Derrick Pouliot on their second pairing. Bortuzzo was a healthy scratch Wednesday, while Pouliot played alongside Ehrhoff.

Ehrhoff has three goals — all game-winners — and 10 assists in 43 games. One of Ehrhoff’s greatest attributes is his booming shot. He’s willing to use it, too, averaging 2.2 shots per game.

Ehrhoff said it was merely a coincidence he made his return in the building where he got hurt.

“It just turns out to be that way,” Ehrhoff said. “I obviously wanted to be back as soon as I was able.”

• The Penguins cannot win the season series against the Capitals, who won the previous three meetings. Coach Mike Johnston intimated that momentum could carry over into the postseason. “I don’t think you ever want to enter a playoff series with the other team having an advantage over you,” he said. Unless the Penguins beat the New York Islanders on April 10, they face the prospect of losing season series to all three potential playoff opponents.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.